Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I do not know how exactly define "creationist" and I do not know if "never", but first scientists were Christians who were driven by the desire to know how God created our world.
Again numbers dont count when looking at proof. There may be only one person in this world who has the right theory and others having a different view cannot make him /her wrong
Can the theory be incorrect altogether?
But he did not say that the Big Bang theory is right because many Christians believe that.
No, my point was that you don't get an explanation. If you ask an evolutionary biologist how man came to be you will get an explanation involving random variation, genetic mutations, adaptations, etc. You might not like the explanation, but many people think it's plausible. If you ask a creationist basically all he will say is that it "just happened." But what was going on in that handful of dust God held in His hand? What chemical reactions? What order did the organs form in and why? You never hear about any of that from a creationist.
Sorry if i mixed them up but u do get my point. Again the concept of theory in science is not what i am saying. Maybe the definition keeps changing. U also cannot have a definition that is approved by all scientists. I am trying to make a point here. My question is there are facts like humans breathing in oxygen and breathing out co2, gravity, laws of motion that can be verified now by scientific methods but making a hypothesis is not similar. I am not debating what is a theory and what established science. I hope you get my point
Absolutely. But you need evidence.
You fail to understand just because u use biology to explain how a man came to be is no way a percentage better explanation than how God created adam by breathing a soul into him. You are using biology as an excuse here. If u claim that is how man came to be u gotta prove it not assume it happened that way.
A theory is established science. It is the most firmly established science and the definition hasn't changed in several hundred years. Theories are the best evidenced and tested explanations for the facts of observable phenomena that science can offer,
If you just want to believe that God created Adam in some magic way that's fine. But if you want to make that a scientific claim you have to offer a testable proposition.
It does explain but there is no proof that there is a link between the fossil records. U have absolutely no evidence that there were actually Homo habilis or other species which evolved to homo sapiens. We can see around us how the human skull can be different than others and no doubt similar to apes. But what u are doing is using different skull makeup to justify different species existed. There is absolutely no proof of a specie transforming into another altogether. It's only a hypothesis
Speciation has been observed. It is absolutely certain that new species can form.
If u also want to believe that we magically became from a bacteria to homo sapiens well thats also fine. You also need to provide testable evidence how that happens
Lets see how scientific are u in proving the above
False gods (small g) do not exist and true God (capital G) was not created.
U need to prove otherwise. I admit this is a possible hypothesis and cannot be proven by facts as u demand it to be proven. But same goes with evolution
There's plenty, if you really want to get into it.
No, the burden is on you to come up with a test that will tell us which of those claims is true. That's how science works.
