Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What u have is not evidence but a hypothesis and u agree it can be wrong so how can u preach to be true again and again? U never proved it actually happened. U are being dishonest hereYou only have a possibility. We have evidence. Would you care to learn what is and what is not evidence?
Same answerI think it's true that God created the universe. What has that got to do with the theory of evolution?
See i differ in the fact that how he made it. U say we evolved from a single cell specie. I dont need to believe it unless i can go back in time and observe for myself in fast forward mode it happened
No, again I already explained this to you. We do have evidence. But one more time, here is the definition of a scientific hypothesis:What u have is not evidence but a hypothesis and u agree it can be wrong so how can u preach to be true again and again? U never proved it actually happened. U are being dishonest here
Same answer
Lol definitions don't make facts true or false. What i asked u is can u prove to me there is link between earlier specie of humans. Also u need to prove the specie actually existed. I already said the human skulls even now appear similar to ones depicted in the process so they were always human not some other specie. U agree the theory can be wrong yet u claim it to be absolutely true. U are contradicting your statementsNo, again I already explained this to you. We do have evidence. But one more time, here is the definition of a scientific hypothesis:
"A hypothesis is a suggested solution for an unexplained occurrence that does not fit into current accepted scientific theory. The basic idea of a hypothesis is that there is no pre-determined outcome. For a hypothesis to be termed a scientific hypothesis, it has to be something that can be supported or refuted through carefully crafted experimentation or observation. This is called falsifiability and testability, an idea that was advanced in the mid-20th century a British philosopher named Karl Popper, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica."
What Is a Scientific Hypothesis? | Definition of Hypothesis | Live Science
So what is evidence? In the sciences one uses scientific evidence:
"Scientific evidence is evidence that serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis. Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and interpretation in accordance with scientific method. Standards for scientific evidence vary according to the field of inquiry, but the strength of scientific evidence is generally based on the results of statistical analysis and the strength of scientific controls."
Scientific evidence - Wikipedia
We have scientific evidence.
What was he dishonest about?Why do you think that God is dishonest? That makes no sense to me.
Looks can be subjective. Dont u agree? I do agree evolution of features do happen and specie do adapt and change. But specie do not change into altogether different specie.Planting evidence which looks like evolution.
Lol definitions don't make facts true or false. What i asked u is can u prove to me there is link between earlier specie of humans. Also u need to prove the specie actually existed. I already said the human skulls even now appear similar to ones depicted in the process so they were always human not some other specie. U agree the theory can be wrong yet u claim it to be absolutely true. U are contradicting your statements
In fact they do. Speciation has been observed. There is no doubt of it.Looks can be subjective. Dont u agree? I do agree evolution of features do happen and specie do adapt and change. But specie do not change into altogether different specie.
As @Speedwell said, planting false evidence. That would be a from of lying.What was he dishonest about?
Yes God is an explanation. The lack of knowledge how he created it does not mean he did not.
The point is that the physical evidence is consistent with what we would expect from the theory of evolution.Well i believe a creator is a better explanation than TOE. Since both are possibilities i think God is a more logical option than TOE. If u are imposing your possibility to be true then i dont see u any better then other believers in God imposing their beliefs. Unless the evidence is irrefutable i don't see the need to believe in TOE
There are many faiths and presuppositions based on philosophical development of society and you are not so naive not to know that, right?Concepts in the sciences can be tested. Faith is not allowed. The only "faith" is that the natural world can be explained.
I am ready to learn and i hope u can also learn some logic when looking at difference between a guess and a fact.Yes, I can show the links, but if you refuse to learn there is no way to understand
No i can also claim to have evidence. Its a different thing to prove it. U blindly believe it as evidence when u yourself say it can be wrong. U cannot claim it to be true and it the same time claim it to be wrong.You also posted some falsehoods when you claimed that I have no evidence
Im not debating any definitions here. U understand my question and u are yet to prove your evidence. Your evidence no longer remained evidence the moment u said it can be wrong.That was why I posted the definitions of terms that you do not understand
U need to double check your evidence. Next time be sure to back up your claim as true evidence and not be unsure.I know that you do not mean to post falsehoods on purpose, but when you make claims about others that are wrong you move from just being wrong to breaking the Ninth Commandment. As a Christian you should try to avoid that
What specie changed into altogether different specie? Something like fly changing into a bird. Give me evidence that can be observed and tested not assumptionsIn fact they do. Speciation has been observed. There is no doubt of it.
U both accept evolution to be true and also accept it to be possibly wrong. If u are not sure on what to believe then how are u different than a theist?As @Speedwell said, planting false evidence. That would be a from of lying.
No it is saying that it is a waste of time to try to correct those who have no desire to changeThat is the same as admitting that there is no evidence for God. Thank you.
No one knows, and that is the actual truth. Whatever our personal opinions are on this matter, we still won't know.I wana discuss with atheists how this universe came into existence. Please keep it simple and easy to understand as i wana see the atheistic perspective. Maybe i got it wrong and maybe you are right. I want to keep it as honest, rational and easy as possible. I personally think God is the best explanation for this organised universe not a random process. Now how is evolution or some other explanation more logical?
Again im telling u any explanation is not a correct explanation. Just because u make assumptions dont make them true until proven so. What u are saying is oh we see adaptation happenings lets put it under evolution and lets put change of specie into another specie also into evolution. And since adaptation is proven and can be tested now and since we put change of specie into another also under the evolution umbrella it must also be correct. Thats the most silly explanation i hear from atheists all the time. Just because u categorize them together does not make everything right. Some part may be right and some part might not have enough evidence to prove it right. If i deny one simple statement does not mean i reject the whole science.This isn't about whether or not God created. It's about whether invoking a supernatural deity adds any explanatory power.
Merely stating that God made stuff doesn't add any explanatory power, and thus is not an explanation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?