Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's lame. I can see real pictures and talk to people who were there. Who was there at the beginning? Only God, and fortunately he told us what happened.Can you physically look at your birth? If you can’t how do you know how you were born? I assume you cannot time travel.
Yes it can be wrong. But you need to specify exactly which bit of evidence used to support it you have an issue with.You do agree it can be wrong?
Where and to who?That's lame. I can see real pictures and talk to people who were there. Who was there at the beginning? Only God, and fortunately he told us what happened.
Uh huh... Do you want me to list a bunch of the things that used to be scientific "fact"Yes, currently there is a limit of how far we can go back. About 10^-43 sec after the onset of the Big Bang. Perhaps you could learn a little bit more before calling it "guesswork". Scientists try to be very clear on what they can determine and what they cannot.
I am only trying to help by making your errors clear. We all make mistakes and learning is done through the process of understanding one's errors.Lol, thanks professor, but who made you boss?
Did he, indeed. As I recall, I read one book where all he said was "Let there be light" which sounds rather like photons filling an expanding space-time manifold. Of course, that idea was developed by a devout Roman Catholic, so you must be referring to something else.That's lame. I can see real pictures and talk to people who were there. Who was there at the beginning? Only God, and fortunately he told us what happened.
Not so. How can you trust images held on technological devises or the testimony of people are pushing an agenda?That's lame. I can see real pictures and talk to people who were there. Who was there at the beginning? Only God, and fortunately he told us what happened.
Uh huh... Do you want me to list a bunch of the things that used to be scientific "fact"
How many were told that a meteorite killed the dinosaurs, for example?
Hogwash. You believe scientific "facts" that will be proved wrong within a matter of months or years. That's called faith.
It did, though. They were in declined but the impact put their lights out.How many were told that a meteorite killed the dinosaurs, for example?
No it's not. The farther back you go the more room for error... I know what I speak of. I deal in history quite a bit. Just try to replicate something as simple as how natives performed a certain tasks hundreds of years ago. Even if a white man was there watching, I can pretty much guarantee he got a whole bunch of pertinent details wrong. That's why a lot of skills have to be rediscovered, by experimentation. Observation and a written method used alone sucks as a way of gaining a skill, unless the person has actually performed that task.Not so. How can you trust images held on technological devises or the testimony of people are pushing an agenda?
I know, I know that sounds absurd. But it’s the same as saying that we can’t trust our instruments of (for example) the age of the universe or the astronomers who interpreted the images of the distant universe?
Not so. Any honest scientists would say “this is what we think, but if we find out something new that could change”.Hogwash. You believe scientific "facts" that will be proved wrong within a matter of months or years. That's called faith.
Well there you go... There is hardly such a thing as a scientific fact, and yet y'all keep claiming to know what happened billions of years ago. You don't know... you believe.Not so. Any honest scientists would say “this is what we think, but if we find out something new that could change”.
I can remember watching ‘Walking with Dinosaurs’ in the late 90s. I was captivated. But today I know a lot of it they got wrong.
That’s how science works: we keep learning more and our knowledge increases. We know that what we think now about most things is subject to revision. That’s why we are so touchy with the word ‘proof’.
Science is always trying to learn something new: if someone were to develop a new theory to explain the fact that things evolve they would be nerd superstars in seconds.
Did it? And what will you know when some scientist comes up with a new theory in two weeks? Will you still "know" the old one?It did, though. They were in declined but the impact put their lights out.
Who said the impact did not wipe them out (well the non avian dinosaurs, obviously)?
You can’t compare history to astrophysics. One is a science, one is not.No it's not. The farther back you go the more room for error... I know what I speak of. I deal in history quite a bit. Just try to replicate something as simple as how natives performed a certain tasks hundreds of years ago. Even if a white man was there watching, I can pretty much guarantee he got a whole bunch of pertinent details wrong. That's why a lot of skills have to be rediscovered, by experimentation. Observation and a written method used alone sucks as a way of gaining a skill, unless the person has actually performed that task.
Now apply that to guessing what went on billions of years ago by observing the evidence we have now... The possibility of error is almost endless.
Not so, there are facts (such as how things evolve) and they don’t change.Well there you go... There is hardly such a thing as a scientific fact, and yet y'all keep claiming to know what happened billions of years ago. You don't know... you believe.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?