Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A story written for the audience
of the time.
Aside from the absurdity of the flood myth, one important thing to realize is that drowning the whole earth didn't work, it's still just as wicked as ever! The story was a human invention.
The fragments that we have in the bible work better with the idea that Adam and Eve "materialized" aka "incarnated" as full grown adults, the worlds new spiritual rulers, on a world that was already populated, a world that evolved from a preveous life implantation, a world that was already fallen, betrayed by its celestial administrator.
Because it is necessary, like every so-called 'evolutionary' leftover. Science would
advance so much faster if they realized God knew what he was doing in creation.
The coccyx serves as an attachment site for tendons, ligaments, and muscles.
It also functions as an insertion point of some of the muscles of the pelvic floor.
The coccyx also functions to support and stabilize a person while he or she is in a sitting position.
http://www.healthline.com/human-body-maps/coccyx
There's also evidence of a global flood. Where I can see the point of view of theistic evolution (I myself believed that before I accepted the Bible as fact) it doesn't make sense when you look at the geological column. Im eating my own words here, I am saying the geological column does exist. I referenced many diagrams of the grand canyon to further investigate that claim I made. In actuality a global flood is a much better answer for the layers of strata and the order of fossil records than millions of years of erosion.
Ah, the mantra again...Of all the scientific theories developed in the past 500 years, two of the most powerful and best evidence are the Theory of Evolution and the Big Bang Theory.
So they keep hypnotising us....
We already got lives, otherwise we wouldn't be able to discuss it.I don't care how mankind got here. Mankind IS here so get a life.
Evidence for that is... not there...The difficulty with that theory is that the Bible presents us with two versions of the flood account redacted together, which argues for a story which derives from oral tradition in various forms.
Great argument bro..How would you know? You don't know anything at all, it appears, about the real theory of evolution.
Lack of faith????? It's more like you find my courage to speak out about a stubborn religious institution which has stunted the growth of billions of Christians and turned off so many more children of God who might respond to the original gospel of Christ, you find that troubling to the delusions of Bronze Age speculations.But it could've been worse, OR EVEN SUPER WORSE, OUR REDEEMER JESUS CHRIST MIGHT NOT HAVE SAVED US.
Listen to Vader.
It's not an argument, it's an observation. You have never, so far as I am aware, posted anything accurate about the theory of evolution.Great argument bro..
It's a naturalistic (i.e. Godless) model with a humongous platform and ambiguous evidence and many many gaps, which even evolutionists acknowledge. 'nuff said as far as i'm concerned.It's not an argument, it's an observation.You have never, so far as I am aware, posted anything accurate about the theory of evolution.It is of course only your perception.
Evolution is creation in motion. This can be seen in the facts of the fossil record. Godless evolution is a theory advanced by atheistic scientist.It's a naturalistic (i.e. Godless) model with a humongous platform and ambiguous evidence and many many gaps, which even evolutionists acknowledge. 'nuff said as far as i'm concerned.
Bold emphasis mineIt's a naturalistic (i.e. Godless) model with a humongous platform and ambiguous evidence and many many gaps, which even evolutionists acknowledge. 'nuff said as far as i'm concerned.
Natural-ISTIC, my friend.Bold emphasis mine
Are you saying everything natural is Godless? Seriously?
That seems contradictory to me. A Scientist being Christian or Atheist has nothing to do with the quality of their work.Evolution is creation in motion. This can be seen in the facts of the fossil record. Godless evolution is a theory advanced by atheistic scientist.
So you make no distinction between metaphysical naturalism and the methodological naturalism of science?Natural-ISTIC, my friend.
It's a belief, a paradigm, a presupposition.
This is about origins in the distant past, so it's not empirical science anyways.So you make no distinction between metaphysical naturalism and the methodological naturalism of science?
In other words, do all scientific theories appear Godless to you?
Methodological naturalism, just like any other scientific theory--not the metaphysical naturalism of atheism. The theory of evolution makes no statement or implication about the existence of God, one way or the other.This is about origins in the distant past, so it's not empirical science anyways.
Are you suggesting ToE is not a naturalistic (attempt to a) model?
It appears to me from your previous statement that you are saying everything in nature is Godless. I accept your "opinion", however, I disagree with it.Natural-ISTIC, my friend.
It's a belief, a paradigm, a presupposition.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?