It is off topic because a fossil is not a book.
Books are based on fossils and radiometric dating.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It is off topic because a fossil is not a book.
The poor guy (Daniel Marsh) whereever he is just wants a book with proof of man and dinosaurs living together, not star light measurement evidence.
It was 120 feet long and at least it is in a book.That's not a dinosaur nor an academic book.
It was 120 feet long and at least it is in a book.
Well that easy to say but Daniel is trying never- the -less to find one.No such book exists.
It was 120 feet long and at least it is in a book.
Well that easy to say but Daniel is trying never the less trying to find one.
There is also a book where a boy named Harry Potter is a wizard.
That is fiction Dio's account is historical record.
Well you got me there and I don't get the joke either.It's CLAIMED to be a 120 feet long, and it's not a book. Romans didn't have books, they had scrolls. hehe. bad history joke.
I suppose because its debatable.Why can't they both be fiction?
Well you got me there and I don't get the joke either.![]()
I suppose because its debatable.
But what is the bad history joke you mentioned in small writing?Books didn't exist during the Roman era, they had scrolls.
But what is the bad history joke you mentioned in small writing?
Yep, I was trying to remember that one. He saw lots of strange stuff. Apparently.
View attachment 189469
But what is the bad history joke you mentioned in small writing?
Nearly, I don't accept Dio's story at face value without any corroboration whatsoever but it could be true.So you won't accept a picture because it might be photoshopped, but you will accept a 2,000 year old story at face value without any corroboration whatsoever. On top of that, you refuse to accept 70 years worth of science behind radiometric dating that is based on zero assumptions because you require a time traveling device to watch the rocks age. All the while, you accept a story of a self-proclaimed scion of a deity coming back from the dead at face value, no time machine in sight.
Do I have this right?