• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,266
7,504
31
Wales
✟431,169.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
It was 120 feet long and at least it is in a book.

It's CLAIMED to be a 120 feet long, and it's not a book. Romans didn't have books, they had scrolls. hehe. bad history joke.
 
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
225
Britain
✟39,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
It's CLAIMED to be a 120 feet long, and it's not a book. Romans didn't have books, they had scrolls. hehe. bad history joke.
Well you got me there and I don't get the joke either. :scratch:
 
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
225
Britain
✟39,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Marco Polo said he saw a race of people who had one giant foot and hopped around everywhere.

Yep, I was trying to remember that one. He saw lots of strange stuff. Apparently.
Bigfoot.png
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I suppose because its debatable.

So you won't accept a picture because it might be photoshopped, but you will accept a 2,000 year old story at face value without any corroboration whatsoever. On top of that, you refuse to accept 70 years worth of science behind radiometric dating that is based on zero assumptions because you require a time traveling device to watch the rocks age. All the while, you accept a story of a self-proclaimed scion of a deity coming back from the dead at face value, no time machine in sight.

Do I have this right?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,266
7,504
31
Wales
✟431,169.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Guide To The Bible

Guide To The Bible
Jan 23, 2017
1,280
225
Britain
✟39,487.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
So you won't accept a picture because it might be photoshopped, but you will accept a 2,000 year old story at face value without any corroboration whatsoever. On top of that, you refuse to accept 70 years worth of science behind radiometric dating that is based on zero assumptions because you require a time traveling device to watch the rocks age. All the while, you accept a story of a self-proclaimed scion of a deity coming back from the dead at face value, no time machine in sight.

Do I have this right?
Nearly, I don't accept Dio's story at face value without any corroboration whatsoever but it could be true.
 
Upvote 0