Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And what, don't you believe in convergent evolution over millions of years? So why would you argue against mammals growing feathers (convergent evolution) in the future (millions of years)?????
What is the difference?
The 'same approximate velocity' as what?
The clue is in the word 'moving' - this means they are in motion relative to us; i.e. they are in different frames.
Reference frames only have meaning in terms of relative motion; it is nonsensical to talk of 'frames not moving in relative motion'. If something is not in relative motion with respect to you or some other thing, it is in the same frame as you or that other thing; this is known as a proper or comoving frame.
As you have been told many times, mutations may be random, but natural selection is not. It is the combination of the two that leads to evolution, convergent or otherwise.
You don't know the difference between two cars moving at approximately the same speed together down the highway and one moving at a different speed relative to the other????
Each other. That is what moving in relative motion to another system means.... moving at the same approximate velocity....
Its the entire postulate behind special relativity.....
But as Einstein explained the major point was how fast they were moving with regard to you....
Natural selection is random regardless of the PR hype. It is totally random whether a mutation leads to more offspring or less. It is totally random whether a volcano explodes and makes a species go extinct.... it is totally random whether the seeds are big and plump because of abundant rainfall or small and desiccated due to arid conditions. It is just pure blind luck that any variation may or may not thrive in the current conditions, which are subject to change randomly at any given time....
You missed the point. The science community at one time believed it was factual, therefore just because something is declared fact doesn't mean it is.
If they're moving in the same direction at the same speed, they're not in relative motion. If you can't answer the question, just say.
You're having a laugh - obviously, if A & B are in relative motion, A is moving at exactly the same speed relative to B as B is to A.
So Einstein did not say anything about "the same approximate velocity" in Special Relativity.
Not just you, but any observer.
Frames in relative motion are moving with respect to each other; that's what 'in relative motion' means. If they're not accelerating, they will be in uniform motion (translation) with respect to each other.
The mutation is random, but natural selection clearly isn't. For example, a mutation that prevents reproduction will not persist into subsequent generations of the population. It will be selected out by the reproduction 'filter'. A mutation that confers an advantage in reproduction will persist into subsequent generations and may well become fixed in the population.
The pupose of a theory is to unify the facts. The problem with inductive methodology is that you make inferences on the larger ser of facts based on a smaller subset of facts. Your never going to get to origins that way, it moves you in the other direction. For origins you need metaphysics which is something theology provides.
False assumption. What direction they are moving is irrelevant, only that they move at the same approximate velocities.
That’s just it, we can never tell. A could be moving at 1/2 of c and B moving at 1000 mph and you would never know. All your devices say you are stationary. All you know is that A or B is moving at 1/2 of c plus the 1000 mph RELATIVE to the other.... and we already know that objects moving at different velocities have different units of measurement.
Sure he did, use your brain. If B must be transformed into the measurements of A, then the measurements are not the same....
No, just observers moving at the same approximate velocity. Hence all other observers not moving at your velocity have clocks of a different duration and rulers of a different length.
No such frame exists......
You must adjust GPS clocks. No third observer is required. Their rate is not the same as yours. They neither measure the same time as you nor the same distance as you, because their velocity is not approximately equal to yours.
It won’t be “selected” by anything, it will just not reproduce because of infertility, totally random because the mutation was random....
They didn’t miss the point, they purposefully avoided it. Just like they avoid the fact that everything we once believed as fact has been overturned about every 200 years and shown NOT to be true.
And then ignored when the data shows bacteria remaining bacteria, fruit flies remaining fruit flies, finches humping like rabbits right in front of their noses.....
Theology started what you call science, because people expected to be able to explain logically a universe created by a being of logic.
Except it can be considered otherwise, as that fact is only a fact at the limited area of sea level. That’s another so called facts which were demonstrated later not to be so by boiling water on Mount Everest or the Dead Sea.
