Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I started hearing that we didn't really land on the moon back in 1969. But I didn't start hearing about the flat earth conspiracy until around 2016. So I think there's a far greater percentage of people who believe everything accepted by most everyone about the earth and moon, but think the moon landings were staged, verses those who believe the moon landings were staged and also believe in the flat earth conspiracy.Not what i have seen. They are mostly all lumped together in the same belief room...
I started hearing that we didn't really land on the moon back in 1969. But I didn't start hearing about the flat earth conspiracy until around 2016. So I think there's a far greater percentage of people who believe everything accepted by most everyone about the earth and moon, but think the moon landings were staged, verses those who believe the moon landings were staged and also believe in the flat earth conspiracy.
In their defence though, I'd say that's mostly due to the mind-rays being put out by the interdimensional reptilian shapeshifter illuminati oligarchs.From what i have seen, they all tend to believe in the same things.
In their defence though, I'd say that's mostly due to the mind-rays being put out by the interdimensional reptilian shapeshifter illuminati oligarchs.
I think geologists probably determined that the rocks collected by the Apollo missions and the Chinese mission are both lunar rocks. That should settle everything.
Yep... But, that wasn't the issue. Thanks though.But all flat earthers are moon landing deniers...
Actually, and I'm not expecting you to agree.... at all, but that attitude is not realistic.Not what i have seen. They are mostly all lumped together in the same belief room...
Interesting.I think geologists probably determined that the rocks collected by the Apollo missions and the Chinese mission are both lunar rocks. That should settle everything.
Actually, and I'm not expecting you to agree.... at all, but that attitude is not realistic.
Lumping people together based on one view stereotypical.
I would agree that some people are more open minded to things that are unconventional in thought, while others need to be half drowned before they belive that they are near water.
That's a bit exagerated but IMO, people have varying degrees of acceptance of views based on their varying tendancies to accept what is evidence and what is not.
One thing I have learned is that "absolutes" such as "all" or "every", "never", when applied to people of free thought, is usually an error.
I know I use them often as well... In the case of your statement, I believe it is inaccurate.
They may go against accepted norms... accepted "logic"... accepted "scientific" "proofs"....I am basing it on almost all i have heard or seen believe in all these conspiracy theories. They all tend to go against the norm. Against logic and scientific proofs.
They may go against accepted norms... accepted "logic"... accepted "scientific" "proofs"....
However, that does not mean that one person can be accused of believing all of them if they believe one.
It is tough to hold a FE view and then accept space travel of any sort... that would be contradictory and imossible..
However, to hold a view that denies moon landings or the 9/11 story... or many others... does not automatically mean you are accepting the entire package... It's not a "K-tell" special nor is it a Vince Offer "Shamwow" deal.
Kinda weird. You are complaining that NASA needs to control their costs. On something which you say is impossible.-
NASA is just a jobs program
NASA inspector general finds more cost overruns in the agency’s SLS rocket program
An independent report published Thursday contained troubling findings about the money spent by the agency on propulsion for the Space Launch System rocket. Moreover, the report by NASA Inspector General Paul Martin warns that if these costs are not controlled, it could jeopardize plans to return to the Moon.
Kinda weird. You are complaining that NASA needs to control their costs. On something which you say is impossible.
Beats me how you're going to explain the actual next trip.No i posted the article because it states that because of money waste nasa may jeopardize their return to the moon. How convenient to have more reason to not go back to the moon. Could the real reason be that they never went in the first place.
I think geologists probably determined that the rocks collected by the Apollo missions and the Chinese mission are both lunar rocks. That should settle everything.
In your view... that is reality.But, in reality, people who believe in one wild story, like a flat earth, tend believe in all the other far out wacky conspiracy theories too!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?