• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Did humans descend from monkeys? Where is your evidence?

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Which species of monkey are you referring to?
The Scopes monkey.
6e6dc5d9e38314b4c7a6410b9c31dcda.jpg
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You don't understand biology
All high school graduates have to be tested in biology to graduate from high school. In fact I have a high school biology book right here. What part of it do you think I do not understand?
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,169
7,487
31
Wales
✟426,963.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
All high school graduates have to be tested in biology to graduate from high school. In fact I have a high school biology book right here. What part of it do you think I do not understand?

Every bit about evolution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DogmaHunter
Upvote 0

AdamSK

Active Member
Jun 28, 2016
369
134
43
Ohio
✟23,665.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
No it wouldn't. It's an early monkey. Okay? Key word is 'early'. It's the same as early humans. They would be classed as humans in a broader scale, but they are not modern humans. Same way as apidium are called early monkeys: they fall under the broader scale of monkeys, but they are not modern monkeys.
Apidium, though not identical to any modern species of monkey, has every trait common to the monkeys that live today. It is, by any reasonable definition of the term, a monkey. So, to say "we evolved from monkeys" is perfectly reasonable.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,142
Visit site
✟98,015.00
Faith
Agnostic
Yes we do. God told Abraham that he would be: "father of many nations". Genesis 17:5

"genetic studies have found that the CMH-the Cohen Modal Haplotype-a haplotype of the MED (J) haplogroup-is not exclusive to Kohanim, and not unique to Jews. It is also found in significant percentages among other Middle Eastern populations, and to a lesser extent, among southern Mediterranean groups. A haplotype is a group of distinct DNA markers—neutral nucleotide mutations, which when found together indicate a lineage. These particular markers were discovered on the Y-Chromosome, which is passed from father to son, without change, thus establishing a paternal lineage pattern.

All of the above is scientific fact, which has only become known in recent years."
http://www.simpletoremember.com/articles/a/abraham-lineage/

Where is the evidence that it came from Abraham?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,169
7,487
31
Wales
✟426,963.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Apidium, though not identical to any modern species of monkey, has every trait common to the monkeys that live today. It is, by any reasonable definition of the term, a monkey. So, to say "we evolved from monkeys" is perfectly reasonable.

Yes, that is true. But to conflate that with the idea that creationists put forward of humans evolving from modern monkeys (not saying that you are, but obviously joshue1 9 is) is not true.
 
Upvote 0

AdamSK

Active Member
Jun 28, 2016
369
134
43
Ohio
✟23,665.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Yes, that is true. But to conflate that with the idea that creationists put forward of humans evolving from modern monkeys (not saying that you are, but obviously joshue1 9 is) is not true.
Good point. But rather than saying "no, we did not evolve from monkeys," which is inaccurate and pretty confusing, I think the better answer would be to talk about the particular early monkeys that we evolved from and point out that they are not the same as modern monkeys.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,169
7,487
31
Wales
✟426,963.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Good point. But rather than saying "no, we did not evolve from monkeys," which is inaccurate and pretty confusing, I think the better answer would be to talk about the particular early monkeys that we evolved from and point out that they are not the same as modern monkeys.

Which would not particularly matter for these people, since they'll still go and say "AHA! See! We did come from monkeys!", without really knowing what they're talking about.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AdamSK
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Where is the evidence that it came from Abraham?
God told Abraham that he would be the father of many nations. DNA show that God did exactly what He said He was going to do. Of course only those willing to enter into a Covenant relationship with God comprehend. Covenant breakers are not able to understand the things of God.

Genesis 17:5 "My covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations."
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Exactly. and yet our beliefs are to be mocked and are silly. I think the problem is evolutionists are so delusional by their theories, they can no longer see the face value of their beliefs. It's as if they have special glasses on. They're unable to naturally see different kinds. A child easily recognizes different kinds of species, fishes are fishes, birds are birds, etc. See the problem with evolution, is there technically is no species or kinds at all. Everything is one, everything is constantly changing, there is no "bird species" or anything, as technically each bird is on their own evolutionary path. Crows are on one path, seagulls another. Yet even a child can point out a bird's a bird. It's not something we classify for convenience, there's something recognizable about each species. A bird kind. A fish kind. A dog kind. etc. - all biblical teachings.


Why do creationists always say that even children can recognize what a kind is, and then always present dog and cat and fish and bird, etc.?

Would a child know to classify a dolphin as a mammal, or would they call it a fish?

How would they classify a hyena? Would they be in the same kind as jackals?

Would a bat be part of the bird kind? Particularly after reading about bats being called birds in the Bible?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tyke
Upvote 0