Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not so, a simple voight-kampff would do the trick.Only if there is evidence of human manufacture. Otherwise it is impossible to tell.
ok but again: if you will find a robot that made of organic components like a living thing, will you conclude design or natural process for such a robot? also consider the fact that we find motors in nature like this one:It’s not possible to detect deliberate design by a deity in natural phenomena. This is why I reject ID . And essentially it’s why mainstream science rejects it. Insert magic juju here, isn’t science. It’s nonsense. It doesn’t matter what you call the magic juju either . Some people call the inserted magic juju, God. So what. Believing that God created everything is fine. Having verifiable physical evidence of that is another thing entirely. As LaPlace is supposed to have stated ,” I have no need of that hypothesis.” Of course he said it in French to Napoleon.
Pseudoscience does look like science if you don’t understand science. And ID proponents do confuse people by using pseudoscientific or meaningless terminology like “ specified complexity “
It can and it would take you only a few minutes to look it up and learn something if you are truly interested.
Who says nature is mindless?
magically? you don't know much about the theory of evolution do you?
Speaking of magic...
Eve was mindless?
actually there is. let me ask you this: if god created human. you will still conclude human is an ape?
also consider the fact that we find motors in nature like this one:
and we know that a motor is evidence for design.
I’ve got a biology degree . Humans ARE apes . All of the great apes are family Hominidae. Once they sequenced the human genome in the late 90s the next one was the chimps. There had been an argument from the late 60s on, about changing the great ape and human family names to a single one . The two sequenced genomes were the defining moment . So yes humans are great apes not only because we said so but because our genes say so. Anatomically chimps and gorillas have more similar bodies (because of a similar lifestyle) but genetically humans and chimps are more closely related. The former family name, Pongidae, for the great apes is retired and no longer used.
A motor is not evidence of design. A motor which is manufactured by humans is evidence of design.ok but again: if you will find a robot that made of organic components like a living thing, will you conclude design or natural process for such a robot? also consider the fact that we find motors in nature like this one:
and we know that a motor is evidence for design. image from VCAC: Cellular Processes: Electron Transport Chain: Advanced Look: ATP Synthase
Truth is truth and it doesn't require your approvalI'm truly interested since God's Truth MUST agree with every other discovered Truth or we must continue to search for God's Truth.
Any species that raises it's offspring teaches that offspringWhere do you suppose it stores its great knowledge since Humans must continue to TEACH our children what we know? Finding where nature stores its knowledge leads us to Jesus. Col 1:15
Water? What?I know it would have to be Magic in order to produce God's superior intelligence which only Adam and God have, Gen 3:22 in Apes. Scientifically, it's in error and falsely supposes that creatures made from water are just as smart as Humans (descendants of Adam, the common ancestor of ALL Humans) They don't seem to know that Humans are destined to rule the world. Gen 1:28
Was it by any chance the conclusion you wanted to get?i already did it and get a different conclusion.
preponderance of the evidence.actually the scientific consensus were wrong many time in the past. how do you know evolution is different?
Wrong. The first definitions were made by Linnaeus, who classified humans alongside the apes within the primates. This happened more than a century before Darwin published on evolution.
"Linnaeus’ classification was important in many ways, not the least of which was how he classified humans. He named humans Homo sapiens, and placed us in the genus Homo. He also placed orangutans and chimpanzees, the two apes known at the time, in the genus Homo. And he placed Homo in a family, which he dubbed Primates. Primates also included two other genera, simians and lemurs. Although Linnaeus believed that humans were special beings in God’s creation, he slotted our species into his system as if it were any other."
So who did Noah's grandsons marry?
Would they not have married their first cousins, and also be descended from Adam and Eve?
If so what do you mean by "one génération"?
It seems like the generation to bring intelligence to the human race would have been Adam and Eve's, unless there were some sort of subhuman women who somehow survived the Flood but were not intelligent.
And anyway, the mother is more important to the child's intelligence than the father.
Do we really need another Aman thread?
Not faith in creationism with evolution nor faith in creationism without evolution. Neither of those are a faith that can save you, or anyone. Instead, faith in Christ!
I’ve got a biology degree . Humans ARE apes . All of the great apes are family Hominidae. Once they sequenced the human genome in the late 90s the next one was the chimps. There had been an argument from the late 60s on, about changing the great ape and human family names to a single one . The two sequenced genomes were the defining moment . So yes humans are great apes not only because we said so but because our genes say so. Anatomically chimps and gorillas have more similar bodies (because of a similar lifestyle) but genetically humans and chimps are more closely related. The former family name, Pongidae, for the great apes is retired and no longer used.
Could be both.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?