What research have you published on evolution? That is the question.
I guess they shouldn't have published Einstein's first publication on relativity because he was a poor student, none of his professors would recommend him for a degreed job and he was working in the patent office as a clerk, a job not needing a degree.
And nobody else can comment in this blog unless they have published works in that area.
And certainly, no one can comment when Hoghead (with 6 books to his name) makes a comment.
Well, praise the Lord for free speech. And praise God that paradigm shifts often come with the scantest of support, often with only one or two proponents, with millions of books written to the contrary. But that's the neat thing about paradigm shifts: a few new assumptions are incorporated into a new model and everything else that came before is miles behind.
When Einstein introduced the Atomic Age with his work, did anybody go back to the hundred books and papers supporting Newtonian Physics? Nope. New paradigm.
In spite of the fact that I don't have to show published papers in order to comment, I will mention four dealing with the weaknesses of dating techniques used to predict a million years into the future (to do this effectively, you must 'predict' into the past many more years than you go into the future). Unfortunately, I also have to give all the data about where they were published or Hoghead will infer they were only done in the creationist venues:
"Problems with Distant Horizons," ESREL'96 - PSAMIII (1996) (International nuclear energy conference)
"The 10,000-Year Debate," Annual ANS Meeting, DOE Spent Nuclear Fuel and Fissile Material Management (1996)
"Uncertainties in Repository Modeling," PSA96 (1996) (International nuclear energy conference)
“Oil exploration under the catastrophist paradigm,” Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Conference, December (2002)
For the last one, I was required to go through a geologist at the National Lab first. He said my work was unpublishable and then sent e-mails to 7 bosses above me in the 7000-person National Lab demanding that I be fired. It's not easy to oppose the techniques used by evolution. Fortunately, the geologist conference accepted the paper I sent, even though they hated creationists (said so in their website).
Hoghead will point out that these are not evolutionist media. Well, I was working for the nuclear industry and it's unlikely they would fund me to go to present at evolutionist conferences. I was also dealing with radiometric dating methods, without which we could not date the earth. And nuclear engineers are quite comfortable with radiometric dating methods.
Imagine we turn this around and say the Hoghead must have printed his books in AIG, and would have to get it past me as his reviewer. How many books do you suppose he would be able to publish in a hostile media?