Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christians worship on the eighth day of creation, the day after the Sabbath, the day of the Resurrection.
You CAN buy a used paperback copy of the Catechism of the Catholic Church used for a dollar, maybe a bit more or a bit less, at pretty much any Goodwill. If you don't want to that's fine by me. I'm not forcing you. It's your loss if you don't want to.Well I posted a link to the Catechism of the Catholic
Church, that shows everything I said in question.
Catechism of the Catholic Church - The Ten Commandments
Looking at the ten commandments there,
They deleted the second Commandment
and changed God's Sabbath to Sunday,
now referred to as the Lords day. They split
the tenth Commandment into two
to get back to Ten Commandments.
So is this true above or not? If not Is the
Catechism of the Catholic Church false then?
Are you saying you do not believe they
changed the ten commandments ?
You now need to prove they are wrong not me.
-
You where the one who said you could buy
it for a dollar. The quote says it came from
the Catholic Encyclopaedia Vol. 4, p. 153,
I believe that to be true, just look at there
ten commandments change says it all.
-
http://www.godssabbathtruth.com/SabbathStatementsByTheCatholicChurch.pdf
If you do not believe the quotes listed in above link,
referenced where it was said, I can not help you
by having a hard copy. Or do I have to prove
every quote in question there to be true also ?
Never the less, the Catechism of the Catholic
Church link shows the same thing I have said.
Do you think the Catholic Encyclopedia conflicts
with the Catholic Catechism ?
It's the quote you say came from volume 4 page 153 of the Catholic Encyclopedia that is the real issue.
You, quoting your own post earlier in this thread, had:
but instead the Catholic Encyclopedia (CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: The Ten Commandments) and (The Catholic encyclopedia ; an international work of reference on the constitution, doctrine, discipline and history of the Catholic Church : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive) had:“The church, after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath of the seventh day of the week to the first made the third commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord's Day.”
Note that these are NOT identical, and thus yours was NOT an actual quote but a paraphrase. Accuracy always matters. Your quote was close. But you didn't quote it directly even when you finally had the actual text in front of you and the person you lifted the quote from did a sloppy job.The Church, on the other hand, after changing the day of rest from the Jewish Sabbath, or seventh day of the week, to the first, made the Third Commandment refer to Sunday as the day to be kept holy as the Lord's Day.
You start by referencing where they came from, with accurate citations.How can I prove quotes below? Are they true?
"On 7 March 321, Constantine I, Rome's first Christian Emperor decreed that Sunday would be observed as the Roman day of rest:[5]
"On the venerable Day of the Sun let the magistrates and people residing in cities rest, and let all workshops be closed. In the country, however, persons engaged in agriculture may freely and lawfully continue their pursuits; because it often happens that another day is not so suitable for grain-sowing or vine-planting; lest by neglecting the proper moment for such operations the bounty of heaven should be lost. "[6]
-
"The Pope is of great authority and power, that he is able to modify, declare, or interpret even divine laws. The Pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts as vicegerent of God upon earth...” — Lucius Ferraris, in “Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica”, Volume V, article on “Papa, Article II”, titled “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility”, #30, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.
I wouldn't endorse them either. We can agree on at least one thing.Diclamer: I do not endorce amazingdiscoveries.org
You do not have to prove the truth of every quote but you really do need to insure that your quotes are accurate. And that means properly referencing your quotes. What you did wrong in the above attempts is that you are quoting some other source that may or may not be accurately quoting what you put forward here. The proper thing is for you to reference where YOU got these alleged quotes from. For example, if you got it from a physical book by Marge Inovera called 'Great Book of Anti-Catholic Lies', published in 1898 in East Tecumseh, South Dakota, by Best Anti-Catholic Press Of America' then you reference THAT book as your source with the page and author and title and year published, the publisher, and the place published. Likewise, you refer to something you have lifted from the internet. Otherwise it sure looks like you are taking responsibility for not only the accuracy of the quote but the content and truthfulness of that quote as well. Accurate citation allows you some defense because you can blame the author of the quote.the Vatican’s own words:
¦“Sunday is a Catholic institution and its claim to observance can be defended only on Catholic principles. … From beginning to end of Scripture there is not a single passage that warrants the transfer of weekly public worship from the last day of the week to the first” (Catholic Press, August 1900).
-
¦“Of course the Catholic Church claims that the change was her act. … And the act is a mark of her ecclesiastical authority in religious things” (letter from the office of Cardinal Gibbons, Nov. 11, 1895).
-
¦“The church is above the Bible; and this transference of Sabbath observance from Saturday to Sunday is proof positive of that fact. Deny the authority of the church and you have no adequate or reasonable explanation or justification for the substitution of Sunday for Saturday in the Third—Protestant Fourth—Commandment of God” (The Catholic Record, Sept. 1, 1923).
-
¦“Perhaps the boldest thing, the most revolutionary change the church ever did, happened in the first century. The holy day, the Sabbath, was changed from Saturday to Sunday. ‘The day of the Lord’ (dies Dominica) [or “Sunday”] was chosen, not from any direction noted in the Scriptures, but from the church’s sense of its own power. … People who think that the Scriptures should be the sole authority, should logically … keep Saturday holy” (Saint Catherine Catholic Church Sentinel, May 21, 1995).
-
I guess now I will be required to prove every quote
above is true, and have access to the original source.
Jesus fulfilled the law and the prophets and this happened on the 1st day of the week.
No, and also I do not know a single Seventh-day Adventist who teaches officially that he did, in word of mouth or publication, and especially wouldn't be found in anything the messenger of the Lord wrote.Did Constantine change the Sabbath to Sunday like SDAs ... claim?...
I think there was a more practical reason. Jewish Christians kept the Saturday Sabbath because in Israel, Saturday was the holy day, while Sunday was just another work day. But in Gentile societies, Sunday was the holy day, and Saturday was a work day, so Gentile Christians went to worship on Sundays. As the church moved away from Jewish influences, Sunday became the day when the majority of Christians went to worship.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?