Did Adam and Eve's children commit Incest? If so, how many generations of their children had married their cousins?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Well, first off, not all Christians take the book of Genesis literally. I've hee-hawed on it. I tend to think of Genesis figeratively, though I understand the arguments in favor of a literal interpretation-- The Lineage of Christ back to Adam in particular (Luke 3:22-38).Havoc said:If the Genesis account, as interpreted by Christians, is correct, then the children of Adam would have to have committed incest.
Welcome to the forum/s Blissman.Blissman said:When did incest become a sin?
My mistake, you are correct. I sometimes forget that the majority, 88%, of Christians are Liberal Christians, most of whom do not believe in a strictly literal interpretation of the Bible.sandinmyears said:Well, first off, not all Christians take the book of Genesis literally. ~Sandy
I consider myself a "Moderate."Havoc said:My mistake, you are correct. I sometimes forget that the majority, 88%, of Christians are Liberal Christians, most of whom do not believe in a strictly literal interpretation of the Bible.
That is a possible interpretation, since the Bible is full of Euphenisms for sexual intercourse, but seeing someone naked does not seem to be used in other places in the Bible as a term for sexual intercourse as far as I can tell. I think perhaps the fault comes more from the fact that Ham told his brothers, rather than covering up Noah and keeping the situation to himself.Honestly, I have always been under the impression that Noah's son (or grandson, dependant upon translation) got drunk and tried to sodomize him while he slept. My thoughts were actually reinforced by a TV show I saw not too long ago on sex and the bible.... I am not so sure, though
So much for moral absolutes. I guess God DOES change his mind about what is right and wrong depending on the circumstances. And exactly how did the gene pool get "polluted?"newlamb said:I don't believe that incest was a sin until the time of Abraham (or maybe just after) as it took a long time for the gene pool to get poluted enough to cause problems in the subsequent generations.
For purposes of this question, lets assume that Adam and Eve were the first created humans. Their genes were pure - free from any mutation.Because of the purity of these genes, incest would not cause birth defects and such like it does today.tcampen said:So much for moral absolutes. I guess God DOES change his mind about what is right and wrong depending on the circumstances. And exactly how did the gene pool get "polluted?"
At that time in man's history, as the race was more pure, God had not yet seen fit to call sexual intercourse between close relatives "incest". Read your Bible carefully. The term "incest" was not used until well after Adam and Eve's children had children. So, to answer your question, no, they did not "commit incest". It's a mistake to judge what happened in the distant past or will happen in the distant future by what we understand today.Blissman said:Did Adam and Eve's children commit Incest? If so, how many generations of their children had married their cousins?
Havoc said:If the Genesis account, as interpreted by Christians, is correct, then the children of Adam would have to have committed incest.
Havoc said:My mistake, you are correct. I sometimes forget that the majority, 88%, of Christians are Liberal Christians, most of whom do not believe in a strictly literal interpretation of the Bible.