- Oct 4, 2016
- 7,236
- 7,320
- 57
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Oriental Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Single
This is an article that is a collection of message board conversations and email exchanges between an Orthodox priest father John (FJ) and a number of Calvinist Protestants (CP) going back to the late 1990s. I find it enlightening on the issue, but I believe I would call it a "straw dog". A straw dog according to "straw dog bites straw man". (Calvinism has officially handled this kind of objection with the Synod of Dort. So for Orthodox Calvinists could or should invoke it, but none of the posters actually invoke it).
MoQ: Forum -- Strawdog bites Strawman
I find a number on concepts used by the Father interesting, especially in regards the canard of "earning your salvation". The accepting being released from prison analogy I think is a good one. @David Cabrera
CP: I'm particularly interested in how you believe foreknowledge absolves God from the charge that He is responsible for evil. If Calvinism makes God responsible for evil (as you have repeatedly suggested), how does your view rescue the Almighty from a similar blame? If He knew evil would occur and permitted it anyway—even though he could have avoided it—how is He exculpated from responsibility in your view?
FJ: God predestines according to foreknowledge and His eternal purposes. Part of His eternal purpose is that Man would love Him of his own free will, and not by any necessity. Those that respond to God's grace are foreknown and predestined to be heirs of Salvation, according to God's eternal purposes. Those that reject God's grace, are foreknown, and are accordingly appointed unto damnation. Those that reject God's grace are therefore, justly condemned.
For some reason, you think that this cooperation would mean that man merits his salvation. But if some ransomed prisoners choose to stay with their captors, while other choose to be free, no one would say that those thus freed had merited their release.
Dialogue on Free Will & Determinism
MoQ: Forum -- Strawdog bites Strawman
I find a number on concepts used by the Father interesting, especially in regards the canard of "earning your salvation". The accepting being released from prison analogy I think is a good one. @David Cabrera
CP: I'm particularly interested in how you believe foreknowledge absolves God from the charge that He is responsible for evil. If Calvinism makes God responsible for evil (as you have repeatedly suggested), how does your view rescue the Almighty from a similar blame? If He knew evil would occur and permitted it anyway—even though he could have avoided it—how is He exculpated from responsibility in your view?
FJ: God predestines according to foreknowledge and His eternal purposes. Part of His eternal purpose is that Man would love Him of his own free will, and not by any necessity. Those that respond to God's grace are foreknown and predestined to be heirs of Salvation, according to God's eternal purposes. Those that reject God's grace, are foreknown, and are accordingly appointed unto damnation. Those that reject God's grace are therefore, justly condemned.
For some reason, you think that this cooperation would mean that man merits his salvation. But if some ransomed prisoners choose to stay with their captors, while other choose to be free, no one would say that those thus freed had merited their release.
Dialogue on Free Will & Determinism