I know, I know: you think you have cornered 'Evolution', so when someone questions it, you feel like they are 'cornering you'.
No, not cornering me. Bearing false witness about me.
I don't care if you don't believe in evolution, I care because your statements about what it is are false. You have been told this before.
I myself, would leave this uncorrected: but Jesus behooves me, to point out, that Jesus is the only way to sustain anything in life - not only 'Evolution'.
That is your belief, but it has nothing to do with the details of the theory pf evolution.
It works from different principles and different processes.
Scientific theories, have implications - amputating study from reason, would be like taking a mad man's lobotomy.
Yes, there are implications... but that doesn't mean the implications are appropriate mechanism for describing the details of evolution.
I don't critique flying, from a theological perspective - but I do use trying to fly on your own, as an example of a theological truth (the man that thinks he can fly without a parachute, is a fool).
On the other hand, if you tried to tell me you don't get inspiration for science, from talk about a fool, I would put it to you, that you think you are above being a fool, when you are not - being educated out of foolishness, is one of the primary ways of ensuring that our work (be it labour, or science or industry) is not for nothing (and that ignoring this, is equally foolish).
I agree. But the first step is to attempt to actually learn what the scientific study is.
You do not appear to be attempting to do so. Frankly, you willfully ignoring people trying to explain something you are ignorant of is very rude.
Here, you are partially right, change over multiple generations does happen, the problem is it does not happen between typologically different generations. That's it. That's my one correction.
This doesn't make any sense to me, can you explain what a "typologically different generation" is and how it is different to a generation.
There is one mediator between man and God: Jesus, and there is one offer of Salvation: from Jesus Christ, to all kinds great and small. There is no condition, that man change first, before he can be accepted into subjugation unto the Lord. The one that says there is, is a liar.
That's a religious belief that is completely irrelevant to the practical study of biology and geology.
I could tell you, I have found "an evolution" that will surpass all the others, but if I told you you had to develop that first, before anything else could happen: I would be a liar.
Now you are stating nonsense about evolution again. It's false and you should stop.
The statement "an evolution" is nonsensical because evolution is not an element an individual possesses and it is not a choice.
The problem is, when I am busy correcting you, that lies don't make for stronger "Evolutions", you yourself are stopping short of stipulating the meaning of "Evolution" as strongly as you could have done: you say "a proclivity to correct dangerous developments (mutations that could be adaptations), is enough to ensure lethal situations in the environment are resisted (by the species)" but you don't point out "that a member of a species, could equally take the death of one of the species to heart and produce offspring that learn from the death or alternatively do something completely new with the species and determine to share it (that more and more of the species, break with the past suffering, without that new thing)". That in essence, if you know what you are doing, is reprehensible.
Lies are irrelevant to evolution because evolution isn't a statement, it isn't a belief and it isn't a choice.
Also a "stronger evolution" does not make sense because it isn't a personal attribute... it's a description of the process.
And now that I have told you, that there is more to the story, you are duty bound, to warn others of ignoring it, at the very least!
No, because your statements are demonstrably false and bearing false witness against evolutionists.
Yet, even then, it would be better if you asked "what is the wisdom of believing in Evolution?" before you decided to correct those who are with you. Even if believing in Evolution "is wrong", there is always a caveat that it can be left that way - while people work out why it is tempting, for example.
Evolution is a scientific theory that is supported by evidence from multiple fields of study.
Evolution is a central binding concept that explains the patterns and mysteries of biology.
Evolution is a practical discipline that has expanded study in medicine, computer science and engineering.
It is demonstrable and useful so it is wise to accept it.
