expos4ever
Well-Known Member
- Oct 22, 2008
- 11,304
- 6,277
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
You are, of course, quite correct. And there is also justification in the future:The Bible describes our justification (as believers) as a past fact (Romans 5:1; 5:9; 8:30; 1 Corinthians 6:11, etc.), a present ongoing reality (Romans 3:24; 3:28; 4:5; Galatians 2:17; Titus 3:7; James 2:24, etc.). The verses provided are not exhaustive. In fact, there are many more than provided. If my understanding of justification is incorrect, please advise.
13for it is not the hearers of the Law who are just before God, but the doers of the Law will be justified.
...and this is said in the context of a treatment of a future judgment for all humankind.
It is simply and obviously incorrect to claim that justification is a one-timer, and I don't know how people can say this given all the various tenses used to describe justification. I think NT Wright has it right (no pun intended):
1. The question of justification is a matter of covenant membership. The underlying question in (for instance) Gal. 3 and 4 is: Who are the true children of Abraham? Paul’s answer is that membership belongs to all who believe in the gospel of Jesus, whatever their racial or moral background.
2. The basis of this verdict is the representative death and resurrection of Jesus himself. In view of universal sin, God can only be in covenant with human beings if that sin is dealt with, and this has been achieved by God himself in the death of his Son (Rom. 3:24-26; 5:8-9). Jesus takes on himself the curse which would have prevented God’s promised blessing finding fulfilment (Gal. 3:10-14). The resurrection is God’s declaration that Jesus, and hence his people, are in the right before God (Rom. 4:24-25).
3. The verdict issued in the present on the basis of faith (Rom. 3:21-26) correctly anticipates the verdict to be issued in the final judgment on the basis of the total life (Rom. 2:1-16, on which see Cranfield, Romans, vol. 1, pp. 151-153). This future ‘verdict’ is in fact, seen from another angle, simply resurrection itself (Phil. 3:9-11). The logic of this ‘eschatological’ perspective is explained as follows: faith is itself the sign of God’s life-giving work, by his Spirit (1 Cor. 12:3), and what God has begun he will complete (Phil. 1:6).
4. Justification thus establishes the church as a new entity, the renewed Israel, now qualitatively distinct from Jew and Greek alike, transcending racial and social barriers (Gal. 3:28). The sharp edge of this point, for Paul, was the conviction not only that pagan converts to Christianity did not need to become Jews in order fully to belong to God’s people, but also that the attempt to do so was in itself a renunciation of the gospel, implying that Christ’s achievement was insufficient or even unnecessary (Gal. 2:21; 5:4—6). At the same time, Paul warns pagan converts against the opposite mistake, that of imagining Jews to be now cut off without hope — the mirror image of the characteristic Jewish mistake, and one which some post-Reformation theology has not always avoided (Rom. 11:13-24).
5. ‘Justification by faith’ is thus a shorthand for ‘justification by grace through faith’, and in Paul’s thought at least has nothing to do with a suspicious attitude towards good behaviour.
Upvote
0
