Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
What DID JESUS SAY to the 'dogs' ? (As the Orthodox Jews called gentile(s))So you think Christ would have refused to engage with a Unitarian? There is a difference between a rebuke and a snubbing.
science is the study of that which can be observed. truth is that which both encompasses and surpasses science.I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
So you think Christ would have refused to engage with a Unitarian?
Science is the study and mastery of creation. It was commissioned by God in Genesis 1:28.I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
Does that help?
Science is the unraveling of God's truth in nature. Sometimes it is flawed because man interjects their bias and narrow view however, there are some who follow God's bread crumbs and use science for incredible discovery like DNA testing for criminal conviction as well as exoneration. I look forward to the goodness of science as delivered by God's will.I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
Great questions.I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
As you can see from the above, it is impossible for good science to ultimately contradict the Creator of that very same natural science.I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
It is about how humans can determine a truth to a level beyond doubt.
I am new here so.
How do you define science? How do you define truth?
I am asking in Creationism because responses from people who accept a direct supernatural creation of life as we know it would be particularly welcome. I am not seeking debate about the definitions, more, if possible a collection of ideas about this.
Science is about the discovery of a set of rules governing a repeatable phenomenon. It is about how humans can determine a truth to a level beyond doubt.
The nature of scientific truth is that, we humans don't have the capability to detect a future so if a theory which allows us to detect a future repeatedly without failure we thus know that this theory contains a truth. This is what science is about and how it works.
It is the predictability of science which confirms us that our theory makes no mistake before we decided to take a walk on the surface of moon (predictably). What could fail us is something else, such as humans errors and unpredictable factors, but not the theory itself (which behaves precisely as predicted). That's why whenever a space shuttle exploded, we never complain the physics theory itself.
I like you answer, but because of a background in physics and an ongoing interest in basic physics over the years, I can say we definitely do not know whether the Universe is ultimately deterministic, even though of course the laws result in statistical macro determinism on time scales of interest. I just mean, say what you are saying without accidentally adding a wording that suggests full-determinism has been shown. In actual experiments, it is actually looking less and less likely (see Bell Test Experiments). Nature, giving us a practical stability and limited time scale determinism, may be at heart indeterministic. (It can be helpful to come to understand such an indeterminism at the quantum level would not even be the slightest trouble for the Omniscient to predict the future in useful ways, and intervene as He chooses, to cause the outcomes He chooses, without any trouble at all from an (in)deterministic quantum level freedom.)As a scientist I have to disagree about the idea of objective truth in science. The best it tells us is observations we can expect to repeat , on the basis of previous repetition. Most of the time,
The model and process starts with the assumptions of unique ( an object has a single life history and future ) objective, ( it exists regardless of observer) deterministic ( that is, the subsequent state is a product of current state and laws of interaction) and causal that is the transition in state is as a result of a preceding cause.
Yet any student of quantum mechanics knows it is neither unique, subjective , deterministic or causal. The very fabric of science breaks down if you assume it is truth , rather than a convenient method of calculating behaviour from history. It breaks down because it is just a model.
The god of the gaps is a falasy because science explains nothing at all, in any absolute sense.
If science can do this, how come new discoveries within it can replace previously accepted ideas?
As a scientist I have to disagree about the idea of objective truth in science. The best it tells us is observations we can expect to repeat , on the basis of previous repetition. Most of the time,
The model and process starts with the assumptions of unique ( an object has a single life history and future ) objective, ( it exists regardless of observer) deterministic ( that is, the subsequent state is a product of current state and laws of interaction) and causal that is the transition in state is as a result of a preceding cause.
Yet any student of quantum mechanics knows it is neither unique, subjective , deterministic or causal. The very fabric of science breaks down if you assume it is truth , rather than a convenient method of calculating behaviour from history. It breaks down because it is just a model.
The god of the gaps is a falasy because science explains nothing at all, in any absolute sense.
I like you answer, but because of a background in physics and an ongoing interest in basic physics over the years, I can say we definitely do not know whether the Universe is ultimately deterministic, even though of course the laws result in statistical macro determinism on time scales of interest. I just mean, say what you are saying without accidentally adding a wording that suggests full-determinism has been shown. In actual experiments, it is actually looking less and less likely (see Bell Test Experiments). Nature, giving us a practical stability and limited time scale determinism, may be at heart indeterministic. (It can be helpful to come to understand such an indeterminism at the quantum level would not even be the slightest trouble for the Omniscient to predict the future in useful ways, and intervene as He chooses, to cause the outcomes He chooses, without any trouble at all from an (in)deterministic quantum level freedom.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?