Featured Definition of Science/Truth

Is something like this video what you're looking for?

This short 3/12 min video is a great animation of how digital information directs protein synthesis.

It asks where did the information come from?

 

Welcome MrsFoundit!

Science is the study of creation.

 

Science is an attempt to explain the workings and origins of everything without a creator God involved. Since science has a given presupposition that the natural universe is all that there is or can be, God is automatically left out of it and no matter what it finds out it is already a given that God is not an option. That doesn't mean science is not useful. It has done some great things and I expect it will do more, but the bottom philosophy is that God is absent. Truth is something else. You cannot find or define truth without some other ground to stand upon. Science is self-contained and it cannot reach outside of itself to find any truth. It isn't that it won't find truth but that it can't. A foundation of science is that it is its only truth and no other brand is allowed. That limits it considerably. In order to find what you are looking for you must search in the right places. I'm not going to find an elephant in my closet no matter how many times I may go and look. Truth transcends natural reality and truth will not be limited by it. It requires a different set of eyes altogether.

 

I have found the 1828 edition of Webster's dictionary to be most valuable in defining terms from a pre-Darwinian perspective.

Websters Dictionary 1828 - Webster's Dictionary 1828 - science

Websters Dictionary 1828 - Webster's Dictionary 1828 - truth

 

Well, in the dictionaries we get something like this:

sci·ence
/ˈsīəns/


noun
noun: science
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.
"the world of science and technology"

Problem is... science used to make a thesis, do an experiment, observe the results, repeat for validation and draw conclusions...They would use this data to make another thesis.. and continue as these procedures helped truth unfold, raise new questions and new experiments.....

Now, however, they have firmly decided what their "Truth" is and all data that leads to this is golden.. Anything that deviates is ridiculed, denied, destroyed or hidden. ....

 

I an Unitarian Church, I head the following.

A man, identified as a scientist, said: "Science cannot have truth. Only a religion can have truth."

In other words, science can only accumulate evidence for one theory or another, for the leading theory and for competing theories. But there is no final truth in science. For that you are in the realm of philosophy or religion.

That isn't what Creationists expect to hear, but there it is.

 

Truth about what?

 

Section: "Science is an attempt to explain the workings and origins of everything without a creator God involved."


Absolutely False. No foundation whatever for this claim.

 

Then it does a really good job of hiding whatever it is trying to do. I don't see science coming up with any answers that say God did it. If you are Unitarian I am not interested in carrying on about anything with you.
The liberal church is the world's best friend.

 

It could be both, couldn't it?

 

Not very nice.

Pretty quotable.

 

Simply add the adjective/clarifier "worldly/carnal/fleshly" before the word science and it is truth.

 

Jesus is not nice (in the world's view),
and did not tell His permanent disciples to try to be 'nice'.
Rather, instead of taking part in the deeds of darkness, expose them;
and OPEN REBUKE is
BETTER than hidden (quiet/silent) love (like trying to be nice imitated) ....

 

The world view and science is often the same. (not Godly, not righteous, not truth, and not seeing God , and not seeking God, and not seeking truth)

 

So you think Christ would have refused to engage with a Unitarian? There is a difference between a rebuke and a snubbing.