• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Debate Contest

YamiB

Regular Member
Mar 8, 2006
492
27
✟23,302.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
In Relationship
I've gotten the urge to attempt getting up a debate contest here. Hopefully it will go well.

I'm hoping for a panel of five judges, or a higher odd number if there are enough people who want to do it. In an attempt to neutralize political bias I would like people to put themselves as being either liberal, conservative, or moderate. It seems ideal to me to have two from the left and right and one person from the center.

Judging for the debates should be done based on how well the person debates and not if you agree with them or not. For example a person should be rewarded if the make points that their opponent is unable to refute while properly refuting most of their opponent's points. Obviously logical fallacies, especially ad hominem, would be very bad.

I would like to have 16 participants to begin, though it could be cut down to 8 if there were not enough people signing up. For the first round people would pick their own positions on topics.

So is anybody interested in this?
Suggestions on rules?
Suggestions on our first topics?