No, I don't accept empty claims as evidence. Why is that a problem?
Please present evidence that God wrote the Bible through men.
Such as?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
It has been given to you many times but you don't except the words written by God through godly men as evidence.
Barring that, you see the evidence of a creator all around you.
The same for the Face on Mars.
The same for the Face on Mars.
To be clear, you mean words written by men with religious claims. No, that is not evidence.It has been given to you many times but you don't except the words written by God through godly men as evidence.
By the same authority I can say we see the evidence for universe-creating pixies all around us.Barring that, you see the evidence of a creator all around you. Just as you see evidence of man's inventions and creations all around you. Your rebellion is not an excuse for lack of evidence.
"Appears to be designed" is being descriptive, and nothing more, in the absence of something to compare it to.
To be clear, you mean words written by men with religious claims. No, that is not evidence.
By the same authority I can say we see the evidence for universe-creating pixies all around us.
Hence your problem.
It describes the issue that many many measurements are necessary for our universe to exist as well as life on earth. It is a description of very precise measurements that are set at exactly the right setting for the existence of the universe and life there. It is not necessary to compare it to anything as we know what is the requirements for this universe to exist and what is necessary for life to exist as we know it.
No, as I am not an advocate for evolutionary theory.Yet you are saying that with evolution theory. You just don't seem to realize it.
The puddle fits the hole in which it finds itself? Is that your argument?
It describes the issue that many many measurements are necessary for our universe to exist as well as life on earth.
If you are unable to address the complexity of the issue and can only see it as a very simplified version that really is your problem.
False. The face on Mars was just a point in the landscape that viewed at a certain angle looked like a face.
No, as I am not an advocate for evolutionary theory.
Do you concede that we have as much evidence for universe-creating pixies as we do for deities? Is not that evidence all around us?
If you are unable to address the complexity of the issue and can only see it as a very simplified version that really is your problem.
I do not need to address the entire complexity of the issue; I only need to show where you have failed to support your claims.
The use of tautologies - the anthropic principle - is one such failure. Your problem.
No, but I could write one. Would that help? Would that make the evidence equal?Do you have an entire history of a culture written by many different people, in different walks of life and professions that speaks about a pixie deity and also written historical evidence of that pixie being born a human and dying on a cross as evidence? That also matches geological and historical evidence for those historic events?
In what way did I misrepresent your argument?I believe your example is the prime definition of a strawman.
The anthropic principle is a tautology. It is of no use to you.No, you have confused the claim. The claim is the appearance of design which is not a tautology but a scientific fact.
No, you have confused the claim. The claim is the appearance of design which is not a tautology but a scientific fact.
It describes the issue that many many measurements are necessary for our universe to exist as well as life on earth. It is a description of very precise measurements that are set at exactly the right setting for the existence of the universe and life there. It is not necessary to compare it to anything as we know what is the requirements for this universe to exist and what is necessary for life to exist as we know it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?