Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (2)

[justlookinla]

But that is only your guess...or is it a supposition??
The theory of evolution doesn't say that it is ONLY naturalistic mechanisms so your supposition doesn't apply to the theory. Try again.

That's the guesses and supposition of 'science', isn't it?

And...what other than only naturalistic mechanisms would create a human and a pine tree from this alleged common life from of long long ago?

 

[DerelictJunction]

That's the guesses and supposition of 'science', isn't it?

Could be...can you show us a scientific paper whose conclusions say that?

And...what other than only naturalistic mechanisms would create a human and a pine tree from this alleged common life from of long long ago?

I cannot offer guesses and suppositions regarding mechanisms that science cannot study. Sorry.

Plan on producing some scientific paper that concludes "...only naturalistic mechanisms..." cause evolution?

 

[justlookinla]

Could be...can you show us a scientific paper whose conclusions say that?

I cannot offer guesses and suppositions regarding mechanisms that science cannot study. Sorry.

Plan on producing some scientific paper that concludes "...only naturalistic mechanisms..." cause evolution?

Just another evasion post in a long line of evasion posts.

 

[HitchSlap]

Ummm....it makes unsubstantiated guesses and suppositions?

Thusly confirming LM's assertion.

 

[DerelictJunction]

Just another evasion post in a long line of evasion posts.

I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.

I consider it evasion that, in response to a request for evidence, you ask a question that contains the presumption for which the evidence was requested.

However, we are used to your tactics and I am merely trying to showcase your duplicity.

 

[bhsmte]

I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.

I consider it evasion that, in response to a request for evidence, you ask a question that contains the presumption for which the evidence was requested.

However, we are used to your tactics and I am merely trying to showcase your duplicity.

Don't worry, it is there for all to see.

 

[justlookinla]

I don't consider it evasion to request you provide support for your accusation, especially since you use it as part of your request for evidence.

I consider it evasion that, in response to a request for evidence, you ask a question that contains the presumption for which the evidence was requested.

However, we are used to your tactics and I am merely trying to showcase your duplicity.

When you find the only driving force behind Darwinism, let me know.

 

[justlookinla]

Don't worry, it is there for all to see.

Want to take a shot at identifying the only driving force behind Darwinism? No?

 

[DerelictJunction]

When you find the only driving force behind Darwinism, let me know.

When you find any evidence to support your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools, let me know.

 

[HitchSlap]

When you find the only driving force behind Darwinism, let me know.

You mean like, descent with modification by means of non-random sexual and natural selection?

 

[justlookinla]

When you find any evidence to support your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools, let me know.

Until then, we'll continue to search for the elusive driving force for Darwinism.

 

[DerelictJunction]

You mean like, descent with modification by means of non-random sexual and natural selection?

Wait for it....

 

[DerelictJunction]

Until then, we'll continue to search for the elusive driving force for Darwinism.

Until then we'll continue to wait for you to find any evidence supporting your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools.

 

[justlookinla]

Until then we'll continue to wait for you to find any evidence supporting your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools.

It'll be a great day when the driving force for Darwinism is found though.

 

[DerelictJunction]

It'll be a great day when the driving force for Darwinism is found though.

You didn't see HitchSlap's post?

Were you too busy trying to find some evidence supporting your assertions about what the theory of evolution states or what is taught in U.S. public schools?

Nah! Couldn't be that.

 

[HitchSlap]

It'll be a great day when the driving force for Darwinism is found though.

That was solved 155 years ago.

You should keep looking though.

 

[justlookinla]

That was solved 155 years ago.

You should keep looking though.

Only naturalistic mechanisms?

 

[bhsmte]

That was solved 155 years ago.

You should keep looking though.

Some are slow on the uptake, for various reasons.

 

[justlookinla]

Some are slow on the uptake, for various reasons.

That's just the residual pine cones talking.

 

[Paul of Eugene OR]

But that is only your guess...or is it a supposition??
The theory of evolution doesn't say that it is ONLY naturalistic mechanisms so your supposition doesn't apply to the theory. Try again.

Well, actually, the theory does say that. However, it cannot be proven that only naturalistic mechanisms were ever applied. In the same way, it cannot be proven that the present position of Pluto is only due to natural law. Who can possibly rule out angels pushing it around a few centuries ago?

Of course, there is no reason to suspect anything other than natural law for the present position of Pluto, and there is no reason to suspect anything other than natural law for the evolution of life.

The naturalistic mechanisms appear to be sufficient to explain the diversity of life as we know it today.