Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (2)

[justlookinla]

This here?

No, that is a strawman.

No, that is evasion.

 

[Davian]

He will now claim that he has no position. HE keeps it that way so he can try to poke holes into other people's positions while remaining safe in his non-position.

Would you like some links to some posts to show you that you are incorrect?

 

[Oncedeceived]

Just like we do when we compare other things designed and not; we develop criteria based on observations. However, we cannot do that until we get there (see the other universes).

Did you forget my question?


Does the design of certain products give the appearance of design? Yes or no?

We can recognize what something designed "looks" like right? Yes or no?

 

[Davian]

Yes, that's common along with 'don't know' and 'nothing did it'. All evasion tactics.

Speaking of being evasive, where did you go after I made this post?

 

[Oncedeceived]

Would you like some links to some posts to show you that you are incorrect?

Why not just provide it when you are asked in a conversation?

 

[Davian]

Every atom could have the message on them "made by God" and unbelievers would still claim that it doesn't mean design.

How do you know that? Are you telling me how I think?

 

[Davian]

Why not just provide it when you are asked in a conversation?

Show me where I have not done so.

 

[Oncedeceived]

How do you know that? Are you telling me how I think?

Oh so you don't like it when people tell you how you think or why you think what you think? Hummm. Perhaps then you might try to refrain from doing it to others.

 

[Davian]

Oh so you don't like it when people tell you how you think or why you think what you think? Hummm.

It's not that I don't like it, it is that you do it so poorly.

Perhaps then you might try to refrain from doing it to others.

Where have I done that?

 

[Delphiki]

What criteria do you use to determine if something is designed?

For starters, it's possible to witness someone designing said thing.

 

[justlookinla]

Speaking of being evasive, where did you go after I made this post?

I've not gone anywhere. Why did you start evasion responses when I asked you this?

 

[justlookinla]

For starters, it's possible to witness someone designing said thing.

Anything else?

 

[Davian]

I've not gone anywhere. Why did you start evasion responses when I asked you this?

There was no evasion on my part. You post was responded to, pointing out your rudeness of not answering questions put to you while expecting yours to be answered.

 

[Davian]

What criteria do you use to determine if something is designed?

That would depend on the subject matter. Without access to other universes, one could only speculate on that subject.

 

[Davian]

No, that is evasion.

Looks like straw from here. Got anything else?

 

[Dizredux]

justlookinla

What criteria do you use to determine if something is designed?

Delphiki

For starters, it's possible to witness someone designing said thing.

Anything else?

An interesting question of which I have an interest. What many, such as archeologists, use is evidence of manufacture. If something shows signs of deliberate physical alteration then design can be inferred with a good deal of confidence. Otherwise unless we have a known history of design I can't see any good way of knowing.


Dizredux

 

[Davian]

Did you forget my question?

Does the design of certain products give the appearance of design? Yes or no?

We can recognize what something designed "looks" like right? Yes or no?

I do recall where we left off.

You will need to first show me a universe that was actually designed.

 

[justlookinla]

There was no evasion on my part. You post was responded to, pointing out your rudeness of not answering questions put to you while expecting yours to be answered.

Apparently this means that this question isn't going to be answered.

 

[justlookinla]

justlookinla Delphiki

An interesting question of which I have an interest. What many, such as archeologists, use is evidence of manufacture. If something shows signs of deliberate physical alteration then design can be inferred with a good deal of confidence. Otherwise unless we have a known history of design I can't see any good way of knowing.


Dizredux

Would complexity be an indication of design? I think it would.

 

[Davian]

Apparently this means that this question isn't going to be answered.

Not if you are unwilling to pick up that thread where we left off, no.

Your... choice.