Darwinism is a Pseudo-Science (2)

[HitchSlap]

Evidence of what exactly?

First thing that came to mind when I read this.

Round & Round

Ratt - Round And Round (Official Video) - YouTube

 

[bhsmte]

Give it up, DH.

"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results." - Albert Einstein

Leave her to do that.

I'm waiting for Bill Murray to show up from groundhog day.

 

[DerelictJunction]

See my sig line for my faith based belief.

Others here could believe that very thing but disagree with you about the method used in the creation process.

Of course to disagree with you they would need to know your belief regarding the method used by your God. Thus far you have been rather closed mouthed about it.

It does seem that you don't believe there was universal common ancestor.

 

[Oncedeceived]

On Fine tuning.

Could the Higgs Nobel Be the End of Particle Physics? - Scientific American

http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0511440.pdf

MIT physicist explains the challenge of cosmic fine-tuning for naturalism | Wintery Knight

 

[Loudmouth]

No scientific references?

 

[Loudmouth]

On Fine tuning.

Could the Higgs Nobel Be the End of Particle Physics? - Scientific American

http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0511440.pdf

MIT physicist explains the challenge of cosmic fine-tuning for naturalism | Wintery Knight

Where is the evidence for the fine tuner?

 

[HitchSlap]

On Fine tuning.

Could the Higgs Nobel Be the End of Particle Physics? - Scientific American

http://arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0511440.pdf

MIT physicist explains the challenge of cosmic fine-tuning for naturalism | Wintery Knight

Arguments...




from...




incredulity.





Every...




one...




of...




them.

 

[Oncedeceived]

Where is the evidence for the fine tuner?

Straw man.

 

[HitchSlap]

Straw man.

Right, because you have no evidence for god/s.

We get it.

 

[Loudmouth]

Straw man.

No evidence for a fine tuner.

 

[Oncedeceived]

Arguments...




from...




incredulity.





Every...




one...




of...




them.

You do understand that this statement makes you look ...stubborn and shows you are in denial of scientific evidence that does not support your own worldview...right?

 

[Loudmouth]

You do understand that this statement makes you look ...stubborn and shows you are in denial of scientific evidence that does not support your own worldview...right?

Your argument boils down to "we don't know how universes come about, therefore God."

 

[HitchSlap]

You do understand that this statement makes you look ...stubborn and shows you are in denial of scientific evidence that does not support your own worldview...right?

I accept all scientific data, including any you might have of a god/s.

I'm sorry, but in the absence of evidence, you don't get to make poop up.

 

[Oncedeceived]

I accept all scientific data, including any you might have of a god/s.

I'm sorry, but in the absence of evidence, you don't get to make poop up.

How are they "making things up"?

 

[Loudmouth]

How are they "making things up"?

They are not saying that God created the universe.

 

[Oncedeceived]

They are not saying that God created the universe.

S T R A W MAN

 

[Loudmouth]

S T R A W MAN

Then you are saying that fine tuning does not indicate design?

 

[Oncedeceived]

Then you are saying that fine tuning does not indicate design?

I am giving the evidence that DogmaHunter asked for.

 

[justlookinla]

You do understand that this statement makes you look ...stubborn and shows you are in denial of scientific evidence that does not support your own worldview...right?

I'm going to guess, no he doesn't.

 

[justlookinla]

Your argument boils down to "we don't know how universes come about, therefore God."

Your argument boils down to 'we don't know how universes came about, therefor no God'.