"Actually, the gospels do record the start date of the 70th week in John."
Show me and I will assist you with a correct interpretation
Show me and I will assist you with a correct interpretation
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
So from 583bc (daily sacrifice ceased) 1290yrs we come to 688 AD. Whats 688AD? Its the dome of the Rock built on the temple mount. And indeed when this happened 1 million Jews/Christians were killed and they fled Jerusalem from the invading Arab armies, (Matthew 24v15-16, Mark 13v13). They thought they built it on the Holy of holy but they built it on the Court of the Gentiles
The Lord has stated that know one can know the date of his RETURN - not his first coming.
I Daniel 7 its the 1st year of Belshazzar reign in 552bc. Daniel is given the visions of the 4 Gentile beasts/kingdoms that would occupy the Holy Land Israel and the middle east. And also its mainly concerning the Jews, and in verse 25 we come to the first time, times, and half or 2500 years. In 1948 Israel became a nation for the first time in 2500 years. 1948-2500=552BC.
imo, the first coming/spring feasts - second coming/fall feasts is a solid theory. It may not turn out like that, but it seems rationale.The passage in Deuteronomy which you reference is one I was not aware of. Quite interesting. It agrees exactly with the timeline of Christ's return that I have long held. For, if this IS the covenant being referenced, and I believe your argument is solid enough to support that, then not only does the 7 years begin with the Feast of Tabernacles, it also ends with the Feast of Tabernacles. I have long held that the Lord will return during the Feast of Tabernacles, based on the prophecy of Zechariah which announces that all nations during the Millennium shall send an emissary to Jerusalem each year to honor the King at the Feast of Tabernacles. Any nation which fails to do so shall receive no rain for the following year. The only logical reason for the nations to commemorate the Feast of Tabernacles would be to celebrate the King's rule. Similar to the US holiday of 4th of July, the world's nations shall commemorate the rule of the new King. So, it would appear from Zechariah that the King's rule begins at the Feast of Tabernacles. One other significant prophetic mirror which appears in the Feasts is the command for all males to present themselves to the Lord in Jerusalem at three specific Feasts: Passover, Pentecost, and the Feast of Tabernacles. Of all Church history, three specific events stand out as pre-eminent before the rest: the Crucifixion, the coming of the Holy Spirit, and the return of Christ. The first two coincided with two of the Feasts that God had already designated as one of the most important. The remaining one shall coincide with the last of the three.
So no one can know this dating that will trigger the 70th week .... the Lord will intervene as a thief .... no signs, no warning
Mat_21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
The Lord is speaking to an unbelieving Israel that has rejected Him .... but this condition of Israel's blindness is going to change [Romans 11:25-36]
"You left out the most important verse, necessary for what you have posted to become true."
I don't leave things out son
And you don't want to suggest the one you pick ..... this one actually refutes your view
In fact the entire chapter speaks of a future believing remnant of Israel that will form the core of the Lord's future millennial kingdom upon the earth [Micah 4; 5]
.... after the fullness of the Gentiles is added
Do not boast against the branches
No it does not refute .... this is what you think
Of course immortal Christians will have a part
And the mortals who choose Him will populate the kingdom
"Paul seemed to disagree with your assessment."
1 Thessalonians 5:1-9 must also be congruent with the Lord's telling that no one can know
The believer in Jesus Christ doe not have to be concerned about the dating because we are not in darkness as are those of the world .... and the Lord has not revealed the dating [Acts 1:6-7] ....we know that He will come as a thief does .... no warning, no signs
There are no contradictions in the Lord's taught word
What is the Lord doing now in your opinion?
You cannot know when He will next intervene .... many have attempted to predict, but are always wrong
And this behavior has done much damage to the Christian cause
You say that what I post on this forum leaves the church in total ignorance .... have you ever read?
Take a look sometime and then tell me that I post in ignorance
.... but you cannot know the time [the dating]
He could tarry longer ..... or He could break in before this day is over
He will give no signs before the break in .... no warning .... all of the signs will come just after and leading up to His visible appearance at the end of His coming judgment upon the earth
And if you are living on the earth at the time you will experience the real signs that He speaks of
I am curious, what things have lead you to believe that His intervention is near, and what signs do you see?