I realize that the debate over the antecedent of "he" has raged for centuries, which would, I maintain, be idiocy were it not for the theological implications. I believe that the preterists were, on this occasion, very correct, but, with their assumption that Daniel's seventieth week ended three and a half years later, were very incorrect. Please read my blog, at http://www.shopeshop.org/split70th.htm ,before you comment.
In Christ,
Bill Shope
In Christ,
Bill Shope