- Jan 17, 2005
- 44,905
- 1,259
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Naturally spirits are invisible and when they hitch a ride in people, it would still look like a human face.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Naturally spirits are invisible and when they hitch a ride in people, it would still look like a human face.Yup, and the only demons i see wear human faces, because they are human.
That might be perceived as fanaticism. I prefer the doctor giving a diagnosis approach.I'm just providing feedback on how you can acquire and retain more viewers. The 2 main things you can do to improve your viewership are:
- Have a more energetic delivery of your content.
- Keep it concise - 3-5 minutes is a good length for a lecture. This may mean re-structuring your content into multiple tightly focused videos on different topics, but that's a good thing.
And though I really don't want to bring it up again how about terribly failed prophesies.
The Tyre prophecy is debunked with a simple map.
Having had the experience of sitting through post after boring vacuous post where you tried to reinvent the prophesy wheel, and make God look dumb, I can save lurkers time. Here is the bottom line and truth of the matter. God was totally and wonderfully right, and Subductionzone was tragically and totally wrong.
"Indeed, in a 2010 BBC interview, he stated that he was 'still a Marxist'.[9].."
Christopher Hitchens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So what does that make him, a godless Marxist?
"Indeed, in a 2010 BBC interview, he stated that he was 'still a Marxist'.[9].."
Christopher Hitchens - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
So what does that make him, a godless Marxist?
Here is a simple one that the gospels disagree about:
What day was Jesus crucified? Was it the day of the Passover as Matthew, Mark, and Luke claim or the day before as John claims?
Contradictions Part 8: The Crucifixion | Finding Truth
Please no apologetics sites. Or sites that are designed to lie for Jesus.
Therefore, Passover (Nisan "Aviv" 14 ) was on Thursday, that year, the Feast of Unleavened Bread began on Friday (seven day feast last to Nisan "Aviv" 21), and the regular weekday Sabbath was on Saturday. Â Â Â Jesus was crucified in the morning on Wednesday and placed in the tomb before 6 P.M. He arose from the grave sometime after 6 P.M. on Saturday, which would be early Sunday morning, the first day of the week, according to Jewish time-keeping. Â This explanation fits Jesus' prophecy in Matthew 12:40 that He would be "three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."
WHAT DAY WAS CHRIST CRUCIFIED?
The answer lies with the Jews celebrating more than one Sabbath, or Passover. There were two Sabbaths at the time of Jesus's crucifiction.
SO, He was crucified on Wednesday. John uses another form of time keeping where the sixth hour is in the morning around 6 am. He says..early in the morning, the prepared for Jesus crucifiction and around 9 am he was crucified.
NO CONTRADICTION
Depending on the website; they don't lie about Jesus. SAB website does.
Get it people, there are no contradictions. The Bible solves the problem within itself, you just have to dig deeper.
Therefore, Passover (Nisan "Aviv" 14 ) was on Thursday, that year, the Feast of Unleavened Bread began on Friday (seven day feast last to Nisan "Aviv" 21), and the regular weekday Sabbath was on Saturday. Â Â Â Jesus was crucified in the morning on Wednesday and placed in the tomb before 6 P.M. He arose from the grave sometime after 6 P.M. on Saturday, which would be early Sunday morning, the first day of the week, according to Jewish time-keeping. Â This explanation fits Jesus' prophecy in Matthew 12:40 that He would be "three days and three nights in the heart of the earth."
WHAT DAY WAS CHRIST CRUCIFIED?
The answer lies with the Jews celebrating more than one Sabbath, or Passover. There were two Sabbaths at the time of Jesus's crucifiction.
SO, He was crucified on Wednesday. John uses another form of time keeping where the sixth hour is in the morning around 6 am. He says..early in the morning, the prepared for Jesus crucifiction and around 9 am he was crucified.
NO CONTRADICTION
Depending on the website; they don't lie about Jesus. SAB website does.
Get it people, there are no contradictions. The Bible solves the problem within itself, you just have to dig deeper.
Ummm....two Passovers...?? I don't think so.....
Besides which, you aren't answering the contradiction.....Matthew, Mark and Luke claim Jesus was executed on the day of Passover.....John claims it was the day before. Your 'answer' doesn't solve the contradiction.....
Ummm....two Passovers...?? I don't think so.....
Besides which, you aren't answering the contradiction.....Matthew, Mark and Luke claim Jesus was executed on the day of Passover.....John claims it was the day before. Your 'answer' doesn't solve the contradiction.....
Ummm, two Passovers?? I think so!
I answered the question. There is no contradiction. Do you know Jewish Holidays and célébrations? I don't think so because you think they don't believe in their célébrations! How would you know they don't have 2 kinds of Passovers? Hmm?
I can assure you that they did.
Whether they believe in them or not doesn't solve your chronological problems. You have one report stating that an event takes place on a particular day, while 3 others say it was the day after....either the one is wrong, the 3 are wrong, or you live with a contradiction...but why should that surprise..?
The thing is full of 'em.......despite the gymnastics you guys perform in an attempt to cover them up....
Ummm, two Passovers?? I think so!
I answered the question. There is no contradiction. Do you know Jewish Holidays and célébrations? I don't think so because you think they don't believe in their célébrations! How would you know they don't have 2 kinds of Passovers? Hmm?
I can assure you that they did.
Whether they believe in them or not doesn't solve your chronological problems. You have one report stating that an event takes place on a particular day, while 3 others say it was the day after....either the one is wrong, the 3 are wrong, or you live with a contradiction...but why should that surprise..?
The thing is full of 'em.......despite the gymnastics you guys perform in an attempt to cover them up....
Your assurances mean nothing without evidence. Kindly present some.
Ok, I have but will do so again:
The Feast of the Passover (a high Sabbath) and the  Feast of the Unleavened Bread (another high Sabbath) were celebrated on April 14th and 15th respectively. Sunset initiated the first day of the Feast of Unleavened Bread. Nisan 15 was a "high day", a non Saturday Sabbath.
WHAT DAY WAS CHRIST CRUCIFIED?
Ok to make things clearer:
1. There is the Feast of the Passover: April 14th
2. There is the Feast of Unleavened Bread: April 15th
3. April 15th was a NON Saturday Passover
4. Regular weekday Passover is on Saturday.
5. April 14th was a Thursday Passover, the day Jesus was crucified was PREPARATION DAY (Wednesday) for this Passover
6. April 15th was a Friday Passover (Unleavened Bread)
7. Jesus was crucified in the morning on Wednesday and placed in the tomb before 6 P.M. He arose from the grave sometime after 6 P.M. on Saturday, which would be early Sunday morning, the first day of the week, according to Jewish time-keeping.
WHAT DAY WAS CHRIST CRUCIFIED?
This is why "apologetics" is a very disgusting practice. It assumes that the Bible is correct and then they look for explanations to cover the errors of the Bible.
Here is another one for you. Or several. Though our Christian Bible has been retranslated to match the error that Luke's book has the passage in Isaiah did not say the messiah would be born of a virgin, it says he would be born of a young maiden. Of course that is hardly a "prophesy" at all. So I will let that one slide. Back to the clear errors of Luke.
No poll at that time required people to return to the land of their birth. In fact it would be hard to find such a poll ever. Strike one.
Romans kept very good records of polls. There was no such poll at the time of Jesus' birth. Strike two.
There is no record of a slaughter to innocent children by Herod. In fact the only reasonable census was in the year 6 AD. It still did not require a trip to one's homeland. And it gives us another problem, Herod was dead by then. Strike three! You're out.
Seriously the important part of Christianity is the message it carries. Not the various myths that have grown up to support it. You should not need the myths to support the message. If the message is true it does not need the myth to support it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?