Since your entire argument of your post hinges on a second job lets consider he works 8-5
Okay. I'll play along.
janman345 said:
now if he got a second job they would have work around his day job (assuming his day job allows him to have a second job, I had to sign a contract stating I would not have a second job) but lets assume he can,
Good point. Some jobs don't allow for a second job. So that's where the OTHER options he has would come into play. Again, that's why you gather ALL of your options.
janman345 said:
so he would work from what 6 to 9 and maybe on the weekends .... so when is he going to visit his kids?
I said a second job was an OPTION. That could mean part time, temporary, on call, etc. It doesn't mean he has to have a fixed schedule. Some places ALSO allow for you to set your own schedule, so it's not like he would NEVER see his kids if he had to get a second job. And, if this was not plausible, then there ARE other options he could go with.[/quote]
janman345 said:
Also once you take that second job child support will also begin garnishing 50% of that income as well
Percentages vary by state.
janman345 said:
so you are not that much further ahead and now you have no time to visit with your kids and your stress levels will be through the roof you will probably not be alive long enough to watch your kids walk down the isle.
This is an ASSUMPTION. Not fact. You talk as if everything is exactly as you say, when it isn't. I was in a full time job that allowed me to pick the hours I wanted every week, and I was new to the job. I had a part time job that allotted certain days off every week. There are employers who will work with you on your schedule.
Also, if a second job isn't feasible, find another option.
janman345 said:
Unless you are suggesting working under the table but that is technically illegal so that would not be "lagit".
Funny. You suggested "working under the table" to him in one of your responses.
janman345 said:
You seem to like to talk in generalities but dont take into acount the real life version of what is going on.
You talk as though everything is exactly as you say, when there is a much bigger picture that involves more options than a father being either homeless, or never seeing his kids.
janman345 said:
I had to rely on bus and all that when I was in college and that was the worse night mare of my life, the stress levels from that life style were so great I would have been dead by 40.
I doubt the sincerity of this statement. I really do. My mom has been riding the bus for years, and when given the choice and opportunity to go back to her own vehicle(meaning she could easily afford to drive herself to work), she refused. She loves riding the bus, and we live near a big city. Everyone else I know who's ridden the bus loves it, and the times I've ridden the bus, I've loved it.
And, even if it was true, there's always a bike. No gas, barely any maintenance, virtually no cost whatsoever.
janman345 said:
I would go through great lengths to keep my 4x4 to do what I want when I want even if its staying home I dont HAVE to stay home, its all about piece of mind.
I said drive to work. I didn't say get rid of the vehicle. Sheesh.
janman345 said:
Also moving out of the country is not that expensive if you have a work contact, you maybe have to buy a passport, as long as she has no idea where you went or what nation or company then she is SOL. Its not as hard as you think to leave the nation I have had 3 job offers to leave the country but did not take them (as I am not in this guys situation), the US economy is crap but the middle east is booming comparitivly.
Fine. Where are you moving? Canada: sure, that might not be as expensive. The America dollar is higher than theirs. Coming from Florida(which I'm assuming is the furthest state from Canada) wouldn't be as expensive as moving to say, France. Mexico: yes, I can see that being cheaper. The American dollar is like, ten times higher than the Peso. Coming from Maine(which I'll assume is the furthest state from Mexico) would also not be as expensive as moving to someplace in Europe. However, the crime rate in Mexico is terrible. Europe: very expensive. The American dollar is worth less than the Euro, plus you'd have to either sell of your belongings(like furniture, vehicle, etc.) and buy new ones when you arrive, or pay to have those shipped over 8,000 miles, depending on where you live in the U.S. So, actually, moving out of the country may NOT necessarily equal more money, even with a job.
janman345 said:
He has indicated he does not want to do that so his choices are really simple he just takes it up the rear to be a disneyland parent (as another poster put it)
Assumption.
janman345 said:
although I dont know how disneyland it will be existing on 50% of your net income,
Another assumption.
janman345 said:
he can get a second job if he wants so he can see his kids even less and die prematurely,
Yet another assumption.
janman345 said:
I dont think its honorable to finance an ex that is no longer putting out,
SHE left HIM. The honor isn't in financing HER, it's about wanting to be a father to his kids. I'm not referring to the child support there, either. I mean in his time with them, wanting to be near them, wanting to be apart of their lives. Or are you seriously suggesting he dump his boys and forget about them, and find another women to make more babies with?
janman345 said:
if she were concerned with the best interests of the kid she would do a 50/50 custody with no child support that way they could both maintain a decent residence and ammenities for the kid to benifit from rather than him financing her lifestyle or her choice to be un/under employed.
I don't have any idea what this means.
janman345 said:
If she cant find a job and relys on child support to get by and he has a job she should not have custody as she is not fit to be a parent and he should get custody,
Since when did we start talking about HER? I'M talking about the DAD.
janman345 said:
her poverty is not his problem only his kid, but unfortunatly the court makes it the mans problem.
Again, I'm not talking about the wife. I'm talking about the dad.
The point is this: he doesn't WANT to leave the country, because HE LOVES HIS SONS AND WANTS TO BE APART OF THEIR LIVES. That is what is honorable. Is he going to pay a lot in child support? Most likely, and it's WRONG that he should pay as much as the courts will make him pay. However, that does not mean he only has two options. He has quite a few options that WILL help him financially, as well as relationally with his sons. Your narrow minded view is not the only option out there.