Matthew 15:22-28
This will take a little bit of intelligence because you need to understand about the way language was during this time. A good start to understanding how language works is to look at how our own has changed in the past few decades. Words that were once considered taboo are now common accepted language and no longer considered "bad". You have to approach this in the same way because when we read it, it doesn't seem very impressive. "Wow, Jesus called a woman a dog... whoopdeedoo." However, in that time period it was much more dramatic of an insult. It was essentially him calling her the equivalent of the way we use the term "B***h".
Language history.
The More You Know...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~*
LOL! Right.
One of our bishops, who is well versed in Church History, linguistics and other areas, and who was an ex-rector of the largest theological seminary in the DR talked about that recently.
You are right: we need to understand the language history. Did Jesus wanted to insult her and put her down? Let's see.
A "dog" was considered an "unclean" animal. Throughout the Scriptures, I don't remember a verse where dogs were considered as clean animals. They are constantly associated with vomit, with eating dead things, and the like. The Gentiles were considered "dogs" as they were "unclean." Let's see the preceding verse:
"And he answering, said: I was not sent but to the sheep that are lost of the house of Israel." (Matthew 15:24)
And only after her insistence Jesus mentions that phrase: "It is not good to take the bread of the children, and to cast it to the dogs."
We also don't see the woman feeling insulted, but recognizing a reality and still claiming for the mercy of God. She was a Gentile, yet she saw Jesus as the merciful Son of God, and claimed to that mercy. To her, it didn't matter if she was a Jew or not. It didn't matter if she was a child of a "dog;" it didn't matter if she was "clean" or "unclean;" she just wanted Jesus' mercy.
Jesus was not calling her names or seeing her as less than human. This is something that most Bible studious agree upon.
If you want to give it your own private interpretation to drive across a non-existant point, be our guest.
-------------
As for the topic at hand, I try not to cuss, but yes, sometimes those words slip out. Especially when I'm driving (yeah, there are so many bad drivers here...).