Here, let try highlighting this time:
To be operated exclusively to promote social welfare, an organization must operate primarily to further the common good and general welfare of the people of the community (such as by bringing about civic betterment and social improvements). For example, an organization that restricts the use of its facilities to employees of selected corporations and their guests is primarily benefiting a private group rather than the community and, therefore, does not qualify as a section 501(c)(4) organization. Similarly, an organization formed to represent member-tenants of an apartment complex does not qualify, because its activities benefit the member-tenants and not all tenants in the community, while an organization formed to promote the legal rights of all tenants in a particular community may qualify under section 501(c)(4) as a social welfare organization.
"We believe that when you scratch below the surface,
most Americans want the same things: a broadly prosperous economy, better opportunities for our kids, retirement security and high-quality, affordable health care."
"We have discovered that
most people support action on these issues, so we call it the New Majority Agenda, and you can read all about it here."
"
If you share that vision, please check out the New Majority Agenda, sign up for our updates, fire off some letters and emails to the White House and Congress, tell your friends, and help write some brighter chapters in the history of America."
Yeah, I already addressed the context into which the lobbying has to fall in order to be considered acceptable under (c)(4) status.
I don't disagree with them per se. I disagree that their organization is exclusively dedicated to social welfare as defined by the numerous quotes from the IRS website I have provided (in fact examples were quoted in the very message to which you responded.
