Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You must have me mixed up with someone else.I thought you believed that everything has to have a cause. Whether God caused it, or nature through God caused it or nature alone caused it, there had to be a first single celled organism.
Demonstrate one (1) exception and you willOpinions vary. Thanks muchly for sharing yours.
Concentrate on the verbs, not the nouns, and you just might understand my point.
According to the etymological dictionary, "fetus" is a Latin term.In what language?
Are you suggesting that he was not the cause for single celled organisms? If so then then the cause must have been something else because we have singled celled organisms. Perhaps the first single celled critters came from another planet.You must have me mixed up with someone else.
Yes, I believe in cause-and-effect, but when God created life on the earth, it was multi-celled, not single-celled.
I disagree.Kinda like the origin of the universe is not really a
consideration in chemistry ...
I disagree.
Harvard University science department calls it "cosmic evolution."
QV the fifth stage.
It's labeled: CHEMICAL.
IF that's true, it's because even the most evil people in history, viz., Ramesses (?) and Molech worshipers waited until they were born first.Nope, still a stupid argument, especially since abortion has been around a LONG TIME, much longer than the theory of evolution has been around.
It means "fetus" came after "child in the womb".And what did it mean in that language?
IF that's true, it's because even the most evil people in history, viz., Ramesses (?) and Molech worshipers waited until they were born first.
Exodus 1:15 And the king of Egypt spake to the Hebrew midwives, of which the name of the one was Shiphrah, and the name of the other Puah:
16 And he said, When ye do the office of a midwife to the Hebrew women, and see them upon the stools; if it be a son, then ye shall kill him: but if it be a daughter, then she shall live.
Leviticus 18:21a And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech,
Abortionists, on the other hand ...
Or the Fall, maybe?Perhaps the first single celled critters came from another planet.
Okay, thanks.They're not stages of evolution, they're different types of evolution, aka change.
And what do you call killing a baby before it is born? abortion?Also, killing a baby after they're born isn't abortion, it's infanticide.
So you don't know, and quote a text translated after "fetus" became a borrow word in the English language to prove it.It means "fetus" came after "child in the womb".
In any language.
And what do you call killing a baby before it is born? abortion?
Don't go away mad.I'm just going to walk away from this because I'm just really getting fed up with all of this now.
There must have been, even in your fantasy, or do you deny that there are single celled organisms now.There was no first "single-celled organism".
Nor does NASA consult astrologists before planning launchesSo China doesn't take any interest in asking Christians questions about their beliefs, so they can counter those beliefs in their science books?
Doesn't matter where or when they came from it was the microbial Eve.Or the Fall, maybe?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?