• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Creationists are told the flood is true and actually happened,

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Most ironic thing is that is a thread on the Fibonacci Sequence numbers.... And he doesn't get it, he's just counting "310, 311, 312, 313, 314"

So he even derails number threads with his ignorance. Amazing!
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat




Its not that, its just that we're flabbergasted as to why you'd care. Why do those threads need to be locked? Just let them slide off the front page and die.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
So, Wiccan_Child, I say the ocean water on the earth is the best evidence of the Global Flood. What you say?
I say there is not nearly enough water to cover the Earth's surface, as we can clearly see.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I say: you are completely correct. So, the Global Flood will not happen again.
Jolly good. But how do the oceans constitute evidence of a Global Flood? The water's all here, and it doesn't cover the Earth's surface.
 
Upvote 0

gipsy

Newbie
Jan 23, 2009
271
6
✟59,773.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
I say there is not nearly enough water to cover the Earth's surface, as we can clearly see.

If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface
True, but, since we're talking about evidence, I can easily back up the claim that the Earth was never flat enough be globally flooded. Indeed, the Bible is quite clear that the water that covered the Earth came from a) rain, and b) the waters of the deep.

So, yeah .
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I'm rather curious as to how he'll twist the fact that there isn't enough water for a global flood into evidence that there was a global flood. Its not often that you get to see the truth undergo such contortions
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Jolly good. But how do the oceans constitute evidence of a Global Flood? The water's all here, and it doesn't cover the Earth's surface.

You physicist is not used to think that the world before now is a different one. But in geology, it is a common sense.

The water in the ocean can easily flood the whole earth when the continents were thinner than they are now.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I'm rather curious as to how he'll twist the fact that there isn't enough water for a global flood into evidence that there was a global flood. Its not often that you get to see the truth undergo such contortions

Be humble. A lot of things that you do not know. Nobody is twisting anything.
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
You physicist is not used to think that the world before now is a different one. But in geology, it is a common sense.

The water in the ocean can easily flood the whole earth when the continents were thinner than they are now.


And you of course have proof (peer-reviewed) that this actually was the case?
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface

The thought is on the right track. But tectonics is a critical part of the whole thing. When the earth was very flat, there was not enough water either.
 
Upvote 0

juvenissun

... and God saw that it was good.
Apr 5, 2007
25,452
805
73
Chicago
✟138,626.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married

Pay attention to what I said. It is not so much about how flat the earth was, but is about how thin the continents were.
 
Upvote 0