S
SIXDAYCREATIONIST
Guest
haha, i meant u should talk to the author and see why he makes such claims before judging him.herev said:
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
haha, i meant u should talk to the author and see why he makes such claims before judging him.herev said:I have no idea what that means, but if you are content--far be it from me to argue, we are all entitle to our opinoins on THIS forum--and free to express them--so again--welcome to CF
SIXDAYCREATIONIST said:haha, i meant u should talk to the author and see why he makes such claims before judging him.
haha, okay i see. u don't want firsthand knowledge you just want to say he's bad. that's fine, but i have to say i like firsthand knowledge. i am not one to pass judgement one such a person unless i know why they make such a statement.herev said:This is a bit aggravating--my point is that I KNOW he is inaccurate in his statement, I make no judgement on HIM, but on his comment in Rule 1. If it is--at best--a mistake--then it calls into question other statemens he might make--so asking him is exactly NOT what I am interested in--I have actually heard a historian (who was also a racist) tell me that the holocaust didn't happen. NOw why would I go to this historian and ask him to explain to me the primary causes behind the civil war--he has no credibility with me at all--does that make ANY more sense?
Please re-read my above post--It doesn't matter why--ITS WRONG, wrong can't be made right by motiveSIXDAYCREATIONIST said:haha, okay i see. u don't want firsthand knowledge you just want to say he's bad. that's fine, but i have to say i like firsthand knowledge. i am not one to pass judgement one such a person unless i know why they make such a statement.
i did. and like i said, firsthand knowledge is important here. let me see.herev said:Please re-read my above post--It doesn't matter why--ITS WRONG, wrong can't be made right by motive
so either you've changed your mind that he was wrong--which is fine--or you cannot process the logic of what I've said.SIXDAYCREATIONIST said:i did. and like i said, firsthand knowledge is important here. let me see.
his aim name is "thetkster" aim him and ask, he's a buddy and is open.
Good questions, Vance. Unfortunately, the two subforums that have been set up as of this posting do not appear to answer those questions. Maybe they will become better defined as time goes by.....Vance said:And what about those GAP theorists?
Or those who are vehemently opposed to evolution, but accept an old earth, like the "Reason to Believe" ministry?
Or those who accept evolution of creatures over a long time period, but who insist upon a Special Creation for humans?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?