Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
More like it was never alive.Cause it's dead?
Which doesn't surprise me.Who knows? The chart was made up by a Creationist organization.
Suuure it does.The evidence points clearly to the existence of missing links ...
You present conjecture to conclude similar genes but different Kinds of creatures.Seems that the Tiger genome has been sequenced and compared to several other cats including snow leopard, lion, and house cat.
Of interest, we see that:
"The tiger genome sequence shows 95.6% similarity to the domestic cat...from which it diverged approximately 10.8 million years ago (MYA)..."
Male domestic cats average ~9 pounds , male tigers average ~400 pounds.
How can a 4.4% nucleotide difference explain a 44x difference in size in only 10.8 million years????
Or, in creationist parlance, How can a 4.4% nucleotide difference explain a 44x difference in size in only 4,500 years?
The earliest archaeologically verifiable use of the cross as a Christian symbol.Which doesn't surprise me.
Look at your icon.
It reminds me of tares growing among the wheat.
Now if housecats came from tigers, why are there still tigers? To "evolve" one species replaced the former. I guess unless it Doesn't line up with the theory.
The seat he is taking was held by a middle of the road judge. They cannot stand that a conservative might replace him. Especially one chosen by Trump.
Then why some ghost animal at the bottom of the chart?
Now if housecats came from tigers, why are there still tigers? To "evolve" one species replaced the former.
If teeth went missing like their links did, dentists would be out of a job.Because on every single chart for every single split those common ancestors are "missing".
Just think how big we can make it with only a 10% difference!
MWHAHAHAHAH!
And presents no mechanism...
The tiger is not literally on there, but it's clear that AIG supports hyperevolution.
Actually, its even less than 4500 years when you consider the fact that both small cat and large tiger/lion statues and ancient artwork exist from ancient china and ancient egypt dating back thousands of years ago.
For example:
Cats in ancient Egypt - Wikipedia
Here we see a small house cat statue dating back to at least 300 BCE
Tigers are also well recorded in chinese history dating back at least to 1000 BCE, ancient chinese generals would even have names for themselves made after tigers and dragons as these were considered fierce and mighty beasts.
Sun Jian - Wikipedia
Sun Jian also known by the name of the tiger of jiang dong
So literally, the 5% difference would have had to have occurred instantaneously or perhaps within a generation or two or negative generations depending on how far back in time we push history.
And the only the young earthers can do is say "well they must have been created separately". But then we run into an issue of...if everything (5% difference and more) was created separately, then we would have millions of animals on the ark, which doesn't make any sense.
But as we all know, nothing in young earth creationism makes any sense, so lets not act surprised...
Except that's not what happened.Found a fossil? label it and stick it somewhere between lines A & B and call it a "transitional."
You can always change it later.
For example:
Found a pig's tooth?
Label it Hesperopithecus haroldcookii and stick it between Hespero this and Homo that.
Later, after giving the public a good dose of how true evolution is, claim closer scrutiny shows it needs to go on another line between two other dots.
That's exactly what happened.Except that's not what happened.
You have it backwards.What a silly assertion. With genetics we don't need a single fossil to reconstruct the history of life on earth. The many thousands of transitional fossils we do have are just a bonus.
Yes, it was a mistake--uncovered by scientists shortly after and never that important or widely accepted in any case. You need to read the rest of the article. But I suspect you don't care because you like the spin you can put on it in item #4, just like you blame the crash of the Hindenburg on "scientists." Science never touted Nebraska Man as proof of evolution.That's exactly what happened.
"Nebraska Man was a name applied to Hesperopithecus haroldcookii, a putative species of ape. Hesperopithecus meant "ape of the western world," and it was heralded as the first higher primate of North America. It was originally described by Henry Fairfield Osborn in 1922, on the basis of a tooth found by rancher and geologist Harold Cook in Nebraska in 1917; haroldcookii was given as the species name in reference to Cook. The discovery was made around ten years after the finding of Piltdown Man, another possible human ancestor, that turned out to be a hoax. Although Nebraska man was not a deliberate hoax, the original classification proved to be a mistake."
SOURCE
1. Found a pig's tooth.
2. Labeled it Hesperopithecus haroldcookii.
3. Stuck it between Hespero this and Homo that.
4. Later, after giving the public a good dose of how true evolution is ...
5. Claimed closer scrutiny shows it needs to go on another line between two other dots.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?