• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Creationism

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 11:33 AM lucaspa said this in Post #95

Wesley was part of the "others".  Do you have a particular sermon you think I should revisit?

I would be interested in knowing what your opinion is of his sermon on the resurrection. Perhaps you could find something in there that you think you could falsify.

Then his sermon on those who corrupt the word of God. I am sure you would find yourself in that one.

He did a sermon on how the word of God is of no value at all, to those who do not have God's love in them. That could help you understand why God's word is of no help to you.

Then another good sermon that could interest you, would be a sermon on man, just what makes up a man. Is the soul really seperate from the body?

I was going though them and those are four sermons that I thought you may find to be of interest.

On the Resurrection of Man

http://gbgm-umc.org/umhistory/wesley/sermons/serm-137.stm

Those who corrupt the word of God

http://gbgm-umc.org/umhistory/wesley/sermons/serm-136.stm

What is man

http://gbgm-umc.org/umhistory/wesley/sermons/serm-109.stm

Without love the word of God is of no profit to a man.

http://gbgm-umc.org/umhistory/wesley/sermons/serm-139.stm




 
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
Today at 08:24 AM JohnR7 said this in Post #64 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677041#post677041)

I have figured it both ways if the spindown rate was 1.5 per 10,000 years and if it's 2.0 seconds ever 10,000 years. It does not make that much difference. You will still reach a point where the first day is only 1/100,000 of a second long.

It doesn't matter. You're still arbitrarily assuming a constant spindown rate throughout Earth's history.


But I am not an artist. There is a big difference. A artist just forms things using his hand and eye. He does not usually follow a plan, and measurements are not determinded in advance.

Just to nitpick, speaking as an artist, artists DO make measurements before drawing something (unless you're talking abstracts). For example, if I was to draw the human face, I would take measurements and sketch in appropriate guidelines to make sure all the features are correctly proportioned. It's a very important step in drawing something, and can make the difference between a good or poor result.
 
Upvote 0

Micaiah

Well-Known Member
Dec 29, 2002
2,444
37
63
Western Australia
Visit site
✟2,837.00
Faith
Christian
That's a nice duck, Micaiah. Because to you a "plain meaning" is agreement with your interpretation. Since the validity of your interpretation is the issue at hand, if I do what you say then there is nothing to discuss.

There must be some misunderstanding. I have suggested we continue our analysis of Genesis. I assume you adopted the plain sense of the text in when concluding that there are contradictions in Genesis 1 and 2. Lets adopt this approach consistently starting at Genesis 1 and see what it yeilds. We will gradually work toward the passages that cause you difficulty in Genesis 2.

I have also invited you to clarify your beliefs on God and the Bible.

I not that you have declined to continue discussions on both these matters. Who is ducking?
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 04:55 PM Pete Harcoff said this in Post #102

It doesn't matter. You're still arbitrarily assuming a constant spindown rate throughout Earth's history. 

Not at all. I took a survay a while ago on this forum, to see what theory for the formation of the moon people believed. 16 people believed the most commonly accepted theory that the moon hit the earth, bounced off and has been traveling at a consistant rate ever sense then. That is this consensus of this forum.

There is a scientist who has come up with a formula of just how far the moon would have to be from the Earth so as not to cause any tidal waves. You can see that would be less than 12,000 miles.

moon.jpg


At one time, all the earth was covered with ocean. So the spindown rate could have been faster then. It may have slowed down when land began to emerge so that there was less ocean, thus less friction to slow the earth's spin down.

Science says there is a direct link between the spindown rate of the earth, and the receding rate of the moon. One is transfered to the other. So there is no reason to believe that there has been any change in the rate in the last 4 billion years or so.
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
42
Visit site
✟36,317.00
Faith
Taoist
LOL

Nothing like assumtions and belief to be used as fact. I guess its a common thing with John though. :)



Today at 03:28 PM JohnR7 said this in Post #104 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=677994#post677994)

Not at all. I took a survay a while ago on this forum, to see what theory for the formation of the moon people believed. 16 people believed the most commonly accepted theory that the moon hit the earth, bounced off and has been traveling at a consistant rate ever sense then. That is this consensus of this forum.

There is a scientist who has come up with a formula of just how far the moon would have to be from the Earth so as not to cause any tidal waves. You can see that would be less than 12,000 miles.

moon.jpg


At one time, all the earth was covered with ocean. So the spindown rate could have been faster then. It may have slowed down when land began to emerge so that there was less ocean, thus less friction to slow the earth's spin down.

Science says there is a direct link between the spindown rate of the earth, and the receding rate of the moon. One is transfered to the other. So there is no reason to believe that there has been any change in the rate in the last 4 billion years or so.
 
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
Yesterday at 11:58 PM JohnR7 said this in Post #54 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=676328#post676328)

Yes I do see problems with it. It has nothing to do with what I am talking about.

The spindown rate of the earth is 1.5 to 2 mili-sec every 100 years. That means 1 million years ago, the day would be 15 seconds shorter. But what about 4.5 billion years ago?

.002 = 100 years

.02 = 1000 years

.2 = 10,000 years

2 seconds = 100,000 years

60 seconds = 3,000,000 years

1 hour = 180,000,000 years

24 hours = 4,320,000,000 years

4.32 billion years ago, a day would be 24 hours shorter than it is now. Based on the current spindown rate of the earth.

I couldn't help but think there's something fundementally wrong with this, especially since the formula over at talk.origins uses a rate only slightly slower than the one John is using, and arrives at 14 hour days, 4.6 billion years ago.

So, I tried out the numbers myself:

First of all, the rate of spin down I used was 0.002 seconds per day per century from this site (the same one John uses).

0.002 seconds per day per century = 2.0 seconds per day per 100 000 years = 0.00002 seconds per day per year

I translated it into seconds per year rather than per day (to make it compatible with the formula from the talk.origins article) by multiplying by 365.25 (since there are 365.25 days in a year). 730.05 seconds per year per 100 000 years (or 0.0073005 seconds per year per year).

Then I plugged it into their formula. I first tried it for 50 000 years ago, to confirm what it says on the site:

In other words, as the Earth slowly loses spin energy, the period of rotation (one day) gets one second longer every 50,000 years.

Here's the math:

50 000 years x .0073005 seconds per year per year = 365.025 seconds per year = 0.004 days per year (divide by 86400, number of seconds in a day)

(365.25 + 0.004) days per year = 365.254 days per year

8766 hours per year / 365.254 days per year = 23.9997 hours per day = 86399 seconds per day (50 000 years ago)

This is versus 86400 seconds per day today. Hence, 50 000 years ago, each day was 1 second shorter. This confirms that the formula works (i.e. it arrives at the answer expected from the site).


Next, I tried it for 4.6 billion years ago:

4 600 000 000 years x .0073005 seconds per year per year = 33582300 seconds per year = 388.7 days per year (extra)

(365.25 + 388.7) days per year = 753.95 days per year

8766 hours per year / 753.95 days per year = 11.6 hours per day

So, 4.6 billion years ago, the Earth had 11.6 hours in a day.

Now, obviously something is wrong with John's method, except I'm too tired right now to figure it out (and my head hurts from all this math). Does someone want to take a crack at explaining this?

edited to fix slight error in math (didn't really affect the results, though)
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 09:10 PM Pete Harcoff said this in Post #106 I couldn't help but think there's something fundementally wrong with this, especially since the formula over at talk.origins uses a rate only slightly slower than the one John is using, and arrives at 14 hour days, 4.6 billion years ago.

So, I tried out the numbers myself:

So, 4.6 billion years ago, the Earth had 11.6 hours in a day. 

I just thought of something. If you have a 12 hour day, then you would have twice as many "days" in the years. So even with a 12 hour day, a 24 hour period of time is still going to have the same amount of sunlight. Instead of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness. You would have 6 hr light, 6 hr dark, 6 hr light 6 hr darkness. That still adds up to 12 hr light & 12 hr darkness in the same 24 hour period of time.
 
Upvote 0

Arikay

HI
Jan 23, 2003
12,674
207
42
Visit site
✟36,317.00
Faith
Taoist
Upvote 0

Pete Harcoff

PeteAce - In memory of WinAce
Jun 30, 2002
8,304
72
✟9,884.00
Faith
Other Religion
Today at 09:55 PM JohnR7 said this in Post #107 (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?postid=678363#post678363)

I just thought of something. If you have a 12 hour day, then you would have twice as many "days" in the years. So even with a 12 hour day, a 24 hour period of time is still going to have the same amount of sunlight. Instead of 12 hours of light and 12 hours of darkness. You would have 6 hr light, 6 hr dark, 6 hr light 6 hr darkness. That still adds up to 12 hr light & 12 hr darkness in the same 24 hour period of time.

That makes perfect sense.

So when you said, "24 hours [per day] [per] 4,320,000,000 years", it's really 24 hours per 2 days per 4,320,000,000 years, or 12 hours per day per 4,320,000,000 years (slow down).

Hence, by the present rate of spin down, you end up with days that are about half as long as today back when the Earth was first created.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Today at 04:55 PM Pete Harcoff said this in Post #102 Just to nitpick, speaking as an artist, artists DO make measurements before drawing something (unless you're talking abstracts). For example, if I was to draw the human face, I would take measurements and sketch in appropriate guidelines to make sure all the features are correctly proportioned. It's a very important step in drawing something, and can make the difference between a good or poor result.

You may have a overall size. But proportion can be determined using a grid with no number value assigned to it at all.
 
Upvote 0

Cantuar

Forever England
Jul 15, 2002
1,085
4
71
Visit site
✟23,889.00
Faith
Agnostic
My whole_life is centered on the plan of redemption. To help as many people as I can, to draw closer to God.

And do you really think you're going to do that by telling people that they can't be Christians if they don't buy this whole young-Earth stuff and that the Bible is the world's premier scientific text? The demand that genuine faith be tied to swallowing this stuff is a major reason why so many people deconvert altogether when they realise that YECism is scientific nonsense (and when they realise the tactics used by some professional creationists to promote YECism). There is no way - absolutely no way - that I personally would accept a religion whose basic tenet was that science is incorect and the Bible is the only scientific source that anybody needs. Before I came across this YEC biblical literalism, I had a lot of respect for Christianity. Not any more - at least not for the Creationist-Fundamentalist version. So you might think you're doing a wonderful job of bringing people closer to God, but let me tell you that you're driving people away as well.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Yesterday at 11:26 PM Cantuar said this in Post #113

And do you really think you're going to do that by telling people that they can't be Christians if they don't buy this whole young-Earth stuff

I am not a YEC. I am not against YEC.

But to answer your question. In general we do not worry to much about people who are not interested in what we have to offer. There are plenty of people out there who are interested and that keeps us plenty busy.

In the end, every mouth will be stoped and no one will be able to come up with an arguement against God. I already know that, so I am not worried about it.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Yesterday at 11:09 PM notto said this in Post #112

Johns math problem lies with this step in his calculation

60 seconds = 3,000,000 years

1 hour = 180,000,000 years

-----------------------------------------
it should be

1 minute = 180,000,000 years
There are 3600 seconds in an hour, not 60

60 seconds is the same as one minute.

If one minute were = 180,000,000 years. Then you divide 180,000,000 by 60 you come up with one second = 3,000,000. The spindown rate is one second every 50,000 years.

3600 X 50,000 = 180,000,000 for ever hour. So 24 hours would be 4,320,000,000 years.

http://www.ualberta.ca/ALUMNI/newtrail/02-2/professor022.html

http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/980421b.html

Beside NASA, another place to check on the spindown rate of the earth is with the Atomic Clocks. They keep having to adjust the atomic clock to keep it in synic with the earth.
 
Upvote 0

budoka

non-religious spirituality
budoka: So you are saying that the scientific method is false (being a creation of Fallen Man). Therefore, why does it only fail in the very specific fields that are at odds with a literal interpretation of the Bible?

JohnR7: I did not say it was false, I said it was flawed. Man fell from God's origional purpose and intention. Some are in the process of being redeemed and restored, others are stubborn and rebellious. It is not just in what conflicts with the Bible. Do you think that terrorism knocked the last space ship out of the sky? If not,then someone screwed up somewhere. The screw up could be in trying to fly a 20 year old peice of junk space ship that would make Hans Solo cringe.

Science is not a perfect system and it does not have all the answers, but that is a long way from stating that the conclusions of whole fields of science are in error. You're not just picking out one or two tiny possible mistakes, your are unravelling whole systems of knowledge that are consistent with each other (and with other fields of science that you have not questioned because they do not contradict Biblical literalism). It seems very inconsistent to me.

Faded_Mystery, welcome to the Forums! :wave: ;) :wave:
 
Upvote 0

Smilin

Spirit of the Wolf
Jun 18, 2002
5,650
244
59
Appalachia, The Trail of Tears
Visit site
✟30,906.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0