hereIam2Worship said:
isn't accepting the same thing as believing?
No. You "believe" when you cannot "prove". That is, when you don't have objective, intersubjective evidence. You
accept when you do have such evidence. Thus, I
accept that humans have 46 chromosomes but I
believe that Bush is a bad President.
i do not doubt that we are complex organisms, and no matter how humans look at things, there is science in everything. but i do have to ask u something...when we learn...do our brains evolve?
No. Evolution happens to
populations, not individuals. Now, "evolve" has been corrupted so that it is used in any situation where there is
change. But technically, our brains
change, not evolve.
isn't love just like learning? we experience love and we then we learn to keep it. would u consider the aging process evolving? cuz the older we are...the more knowledge we gain.
The aging process is development. It applies to an
individual. Again, evolution happens to
populations.
Populations change over generations.
i realyl don't see how the "Argument from Personal Incredulity" is a poor argument.
Because whether you can believe it or not has nothing to do with reality. The Argument from Personal Incredulity is about your limitations in imagination, not about what is real.
Let's take another example: Schroedinger's Cat. In this thought experiment, Schroedinger had a cat in a closed box where a block of cyanide would be released at the decay of a Uranium. According to quantum mechanics, as long as you don't open the box, the cat is
both dead and alive at the same time. That is hard to imagine, isn't it? A cat is either dead or it is alive. But it can't be both at the same time. Yet it turns out that this is exactly what happens. Recent experiments using atoms instead of cats shows that indeed both conditions exist at once. In a variation of this, it is shown that an electrical current runs in
both directions in a wire at the same time.
Now, it's difficult for you to imagine how natural selection can produce complex designs. But it does. We can go into detail exactly how it does.
wat do u think about biblical prophecies?
Most of the prophecies were written after the fact. That is, the event already happened when the authors had the characters "prophecy" it. This was accepted practice of the day. Read Herodotus and his
History of the Pelopponesian War for the same thing in a secular setting. So it's not deception but simply a different way of doing things than we do today.
the rapture is a prophecy that Jesus would come to take all Christians to heaven in a blink of an eye. to be honest, I'm interested wat u think.
o by the way, i'm only 13
None of this is part of science. It is part of Christian belief. From the Nicean Creed:
" He shall come again with glory
(Matthew 24: 27)
to judge the living and the dead;
(Acts 10: 42; 2 Timothy 4: 1)
Whose Kingdom shall have no end."
Personally, I'm not holding my breath. I have no expectation that this will happen in my lifetime or the lifetime of my children.