Creation is winning by Evolutions rules

[Gottservant]

As technical as you want to be, Creation science is out-doing - out-surviving, out-evolving, out-creating - Evolution science. Just look at the evidence!

Creation - existed from the dawn of time
Evolution - existed later than the dawn of time

Creation - followers prepared to die for the belief
Evolution - followers not prepared to die for belief

Creation - messaging spreading to all parts of the world
Evolution - message spreading to some parts of the world

Creation - specific changes in creation predicted
Evolution - specific changes in creation yet to be predicted

Creation - eternal hypotheses (Heaven, Hell, Judgement Day, etc.)
Evolution - temporal hypotheses (life, death, etc.?)

Ok, so Evolution is losing, for the moment. But let's make this a fair fight! (NOTE: I recognize that Evolution is not a religion. Please do not feel bad evolution can't succeed as a religion, just laugh that it can't... if you can).

Evolution - An author (Darwin et al.)
Creation - An eternal Saviour (the Lord Jesus Christ)

Evolution - no commitment to belief
Creation - life-long commitment to belief

Evolution - no commitment to theory (you don't change evolution)
Creation - total commitment to religion (you change at all costs)

Evolution - changing from finding to finding
Creation - constant from the first finding (God)

Evolution - number of people in Hell = all of them
Creation - number of people in Hell = less and less

Take a look! As far as standards go, the Lord has led us to victory all the way. Who knows? Perhaps evolution will lift its standards. Imagine that, Creationism showing Evolution how to have real standards!

 

[Manning]

This is a convincing and realistic argument that is sure to convince any god hating evolutionists to join your side.

 

[Pete Harcoff]

Yay, another false dichotomy between evolution and Christianity!

 

[Gottservant]

Yay, another false dichotomy between evolution and Christianity!

Granted, I am applying the rules of evolution loosely. But its hardly a theoretical exposition. You are applying the rules of theory to a simple... conjecture.

 

[HappyHealthyHolyRoller]

naHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHA
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This has to be the most hilarious thing I have read since...
I dunno.!

Alright, guys, I am now sold on Creation Science and if this thing doesn't persuade you there must be a cognitive malfnction or something. naHAHAhahah!...

...number of evolutionists going to hell: all of them... naHAhaha...

 

[Jase]

That's funny. I wasn't aware creation was incompatible with evolution. Now I know there is something people call themselves that combines the two... it's on the tip of my tongue - ah! Theistic evolutionist....

Creation is not the same as creationism. Creation is an act. Creationism is an attempt at discrediting evolution by disguising itself as science.

 

[HappyHealthyHolyRoller]

GAAA!
gottservant's Post to C/F Link ratio is higher than mine. His stands at 16 Posts/20 Views and mine is 64 Posts/60 Views. Darn. I have been de-throned...

 

[Pete Harcoff]

Granted, I am applying the rules of evolution loosely. But its hardly a theoretical exposition. You are applying the rules of theory to a simple... conjecture.

You're doing what now? Looked more like you were making things up as you went along.

 

[nvxplorer]

This has to be the most hilarious thing I have read since...

Apes Don't Shave

Ten

Evolution is a Mafia in Worldwide

 

[Hydra009]

There's one crucial category that creationism is lacking, though: fact. And that's the only category that matters.

 

[Gottservant]

This is a convincing and realistic argument that is sure to convince any god hating evolutionists to join your side.

Hey, thanks, by the way. Your reply was so positive that I had to think twice and make sure I mentioned how much I really appreciate words as kind as that.

 

[Pete Harcoff]

Apes Don't Shave

Ten

Evolution is a Mafia in Worldwide

Don't forget dancing greenland.

 

[Gottservant]

That's funny. I wasn't aware creation was incompatible with evolution. Now I know there is something people call themselves that combines the two... it's on the tip of my tongue - ah! Theistic evolutionist....

If evolution and creation were compatible you could evolve salvation. One of them is a lie: evolution. God does not evolve.

 

[nvxplorer]

If evolution and creation were compatible you could evolve salvation. One of them is a lie: evolution. God does not evolve.

I'm more interested in evolving malt liquor. Carlsberg Elephant is highly evolved.

 

[JohnR7]

As technical as you want to be, Creation science is out-doing - out-surviving, out-evolving, out-creating - Evolution science. Just look at the evidence!

Yes, Creationists can out evolve the evos "For we walk by faith, not by sight". (2cor5:7)
So they are limited to what they can see by their natural eyes and natural sense.

Isaiah 6:9-10
And He said, "Go, and tell this people:
'Keep on hearing, but do not understand;
Keep on seeing, but do not perceive.'

[10] "Make the heart of this people dull,
And their ears heavy,
And shut their eyes;
Lest they see with their eyes,
And hear with their ears,
And understand with their heart,
And return and be healed."

 

[random_guy]

If evolution and creation were compatible you could evolve salvation. One of them is a lie: evolution. God does not evolve.

Yes, because we all know that salvation is in human chromosome #2 caused by a point mutation and inversion. Where do you guys come up with this stuff?

 

[Dal M.]

Apples = Smooth, shiny skin
Oranges = Bumpy, tough skin

Apples = Hard, mealy flesh surrounding a core
Oranges = Soft, pulpy flesh divided into sections

Apples = The juice does not have any known mixer applications
Oranges = You can't make a Screwdriver without 'em

I hope this comparison has been enlightening.

(For the irony-impaired: comparing the theory of evolution to the Christian doctrine of creation is like - that's right - comparing apples and oranges. The two ideas exist in what Gould called "non-overlapping magisteria." That is to say, science describes the natural, religion describes the supernatural, and you can't judge the one by the standards of the other. It's true that the theory of evolution doesn't attempt to describe what happens in the afterlife. But it doesn't need to. That's not what its purpose is. It's an explanation of biodiversity, not an all-encompassing worldview which needs to answer all your religious questions point-for-point in order to be useful.)

 

[Pete Harcoff]

Yes, because we all know that salvation is in human chromosome #2 caused by a point mutation and inversion. Where do you guys come up with this stuff?

I'm guessing recreational narcotics. But that's just me.

 

[nvxplorer]

Don't forget dancing greenland.

LOL

I forgot about that one

 

[Valkhorn]

Creation - comes in thousands of forms, each one different
Evolution - a unified theory which has been fine-tuned to fit evidence

Creation - followers prepared to die for the belief
Evolution - is not a belief. It is a scientific theory.

Creation - messaging spreading to all parts of the world in terms of word of mouth and gossip
Evolution - message spreading to all parts of the world in terms of application, useability, and even being able to find petroleum

Creation - nothing is predicted with creation
Evolution - there have been ample predictions which have been shown to be correct

Creation - hypothesis changes based on interpretation of any myth
Evolution - theory changes as evidence surfaces, allowing for correction

Ok, so Creationism is losing, for the moment. But let's make this a fair fight!

Evolution - An author (Darwin et al.), who was a scientist. Plus the Theory exists with or without the author as does the evidence.
Creation - Moses wrote Genesis apparently

Evolution - is not a belief
Creation - life-long commitment to belief IN SPITE OF CONTRARY EVIDENCE

Evolution - changes based on facts to better support them
Creation - total commitment to religion (because they say so)

Evolution - changing from finding to finding
Creation - constant from the first finding (You just said it changed. Is lying ok with your religious belief?)

Evolution - including Theistic Evolutionists? How mean-spirited
Creation - so it doesn't save people from Hell? What's the point then?