Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, he was correct in his statement. It was a stand alone statement that only suggest that you do your homework a bit better. It was not meant to support or oppose any point so it was not a red herring. Again, you failed in using logical fallacies correctly.
Some do,some don't...I'm in the latter camp,but I would like a Bible with litte to NO errors in it...any ideas?
No,I want an ENTIRE Bible that is error free.
Interesting that you should provide links to three scholars that have both evangelical beliefs and are biblical maximalists, and reject the prevailing documentary hypothesis.
Yet despite this, none of them consider the creation account literal or factual, and generally see the pre-united monarchy period as "history turned to mythology" to use Kitchen's words.
Since we have seen so many specific challenges over the years yield to such specific data in favor of the text, a presumption tends to build that we should go with the text until definite contrary information is available. This methodology that says that the text is innocent until proven guilty is not only recommended as a good procedure for American jurisprudence, but it is recommended in the area of examining the claims of the Scipture as well (Kaiser Jr 2001: 108).
No, you simply don't understand your logical fallacies.I have and I know when you use a red herring fallacy. You do it, but won't admit it.
No, it's why detectives look for additional physical / empirical evidence to cooberate or double check what claimed eyewitnesses told them.
Not so. The police in my country call for eyewitness testimony. Of course, all evidence available needs to be examined, but eyewitness testimony is considered of considerable value.
Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables.
New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals. Evolutionist fail to admit that no species has ever been proven to have evolved in any way. Evolution is simply pie-in-the-sky conjecture without scientific proof.
All you have to do is understand Genesis Chapter one since it is the complete History/outline of ALL of the 6 Days/Ages of the Creation of the perfect 3rd Heaven. This changes old time superstitious "beliefs" into empirical Facts. The problem is with the ancient interpretation. Only the people of today can possibly understand Genesis. Dan 12:4 Amen?
Now, about the to contradictory accounts. It is my position that we must step outside the fundamentalist box and come to the text open-minded. It is my position that there are two contradictory accounts.
Not if they can avoid it.
They try very hard not to bring in the lab. I worked with such people.
LOL, WHAT???
Did you really just say that detectives are going to try to AVOID finding physical evidence to solve their case or confirm witness testimonies?Just how far removed from reality are you?
That would be dumb to write scripture only for "people of today."
No, they compliment each other. Have an open mind.
Are you saying that the gullible are the only ones who will be saved? the ones who use the brains God gave them and ask for evidence will be damned?It's God's brilliant plan for assuring that only those who believe in Him BY FAITH can be saved.
That's not the definition this site abides by, nor what I said. I said a Christian believes in the biblical god (YHWH, though many don't know that name), and accepts Jesus Christ as their lord and savior. Nothing else. It doesn't matter if they think that is the only way to salvation or not, that is literally all that is needed to be a Christian. The qualifications for specific denominations are different, but to be a Christian in general, you need only those two things.Try dropping in to your nearest liberal Presbyterian, Methodist or Episcopalian church and ask them if they believe in YHWH and accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Saviour? Even go a step further and ask if they believe Acts 4:12 (ESV) about Jesus, 'And there is salvation in no one else, for there is no other name under heaven given among men by which we must be saved'.
You will quickly find that to own the name of Protestant does not necessarily equate with being a Christian who accepts Jesus Christ as Lord and Saviour and the only way to obtain eternal salvation.
Oz
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?