- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,652
- 52,517
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
I thought you wanted to keep this conversation relegated to the Old Testament?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I thought you wanted to keep this conversation relegated to the Old Testament?We share at most 4% of Neanderthal genes (I am 2.4%). They were almost entirely unrelated to present day humans. You can't explain that with Scripture!
Ah ... got it ... thanks.Lol, it is a man watching the world as an observer (you can see the nose on the right).
I thought you wanted to keep this conversation relegated to the Old Testament?
Of course you don't know this or have any meaningfulYet, they do not hesitate to fill-in gaps without evidence themselves, with speculation of all sorts.
Nope.We are. Neanderthals has to fit somewhere in the beginning of creation, right?
You mean like here?Of course you don't know this or have any meaningful
example coz you made it up so as to clain hypoicrisy
Intellectual dishonesty has no bounds for you, does it?You mean like here?
This is one of my favorite pictures:
See those blue lines?
How many missing links do you think they're glossing over, just to connect the dots?
Nope.
They didn't come around until after the Exodus, when God warned them about it.
Remember where I quoted it from?
Deuteronomy 28:59 Then the LORD will make thy plagues wonderful, and the plagues of thy seed, even great plagues, and of long continuance, and sore sicknesses, and of long continuance.
That's right.This verse has nothing to do with neanderthals.
I agree.There is no room in Biblical earth history to fit 5-6 million years, let alone the lower tiers of the simplified ancestry in that chart, which no doubt adds millions more years.
You might want to check your photo album again.Freth said:I might act like a monkey once in a while, but that doesn't mean I have a monkey in my family tree.
That's right.
Because neanderthals are a figment of science's imagination -- a misnomer, mislabel.
They were human beings from the day of their birth, to their death.
It's like finding a graveyard full of guillotine victims and labeling them Homo sine capite, then claiming they predated Homo sapiens by a million years.
No -- they weren't some prehistoric race.
They were human beings who had an unfortunate date with the guillotine.
I might act like a monkey once in a while, but that doesn't mean I have a monkey in my family tree.
Can we use a blue line???How do you explain that they share less than 4% of their DNA with modern humans?
I don't.How do you explain that they share less than 4% of their DNA with modern humans?
According to evolution, we're Grade A Great Apes.Who thinks that they do? Certainly not evolutionists.
We are:According to evolution, we're Grade A Great Apes.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?