The point of the parable of the fig tree isn't about a "one year extension". This parable goes back to Isaiah 5.I already stated to you the one year extension period after the cross, Luke 13:6-9
Isaiah 5
"Isaiah 5 BSB" Isaiah 5 BSB
Upvote
0
The point of the parable of the fig tree isn't about a "one year extension". This parable goes back to Isaiah 5.I already stated to you the one year extension period after the cross, Luke 13:6-9
I'm confused as to why Acts 7 is being brought up?
The apostate religious leaders certainly knew the consequences of rejecting God based on what was written in the Scriptures they had memorized.
Was this not a rejection of God?By Acts 7, the national leaders of Israel rejected the Holy Spirit
Paul didn't explain that in any of his writing.Daniel's 70th week have since been postponed indefinitely, and all of us have since been beneficiaries of that nation's fall, as Paul would later explained in Romans 11:11
Paul didn't explain that in any of his writing.
If Daniel's 70th week has been postponed....then Jesus wasn't our Christ (but, of course, I don't believe that is the case).
Jesus arrived just as prophesied.....anointed in 27 AD. The 490 years (7 x 70) ended in 34 AD. Jesus was cut off in the middle of the 70th week, in 30 AD. Postponing the 70th week dismisses the entire ministry of Jesus.
Was this not a rejection of God?
John 19:15 ~ Away with him,” they yelled. “Away with him! Crucify him!” “What? Crucify your king?” Pilate asked. “We have no king but Caesar,” the leading priests shouted back.
God finally unveiled his hidden plan to save the Gentiles independent of the nation Israel, a plan he had kept hidden since the world began (Ephesians 3:9).
The claim above completely falls apart based on the New Covenant fulfilled by the blood of Christ at Calvary.
The ultimate fulfillment of Israel is found in Matthew 1:1, as confirmed by Paul in Galatians 3:16, and by Christ in Luke 24:25-27.
Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, the Two Peoples of God doctrine of modern Dispensational Theology falls apart, and the pretrib removal of the Church falls with it.
The New Covenant: Bob George
.
When did Israel lose her status as God's favorite nation, according to your doctrine?
The trouble with that belief is that it completely dismisses how God restored those that were condemned by the Old Covenant and given life through the New Covenant (people like Mary, the mother of Jesus, Peter, Andrew, John, Matthew, Paul, etc). That's not the biblical narrative. Instead....God was bringing together the faithful remnant and the faithful Gentiles and making one new Israel of God. The one event that illustrates this beautifully (in my opinion) is recorded in Acts 10...where Peter and other Jewish men that had been under the Old Covenant were able to witness the Holy Spirit being poured out on the Gentiles...."in the same way" that occurred to Peter and the Jews.God finally unveiled his hidden plan to save the Gentiles independent of the nation Israel, a plan he had kept hidden since the world began (Ephesians 3:9).
This is what Ephesians 2 says....this quoted statement seems to be adding a lot more to the biblical story than what is actually there:Once you realized this, Ephesians 2 and 3 take on totally new meaning, and you as a former Gentile, will really praise God the Father for his wonderful plan. And you will not be upset that Jesus was only speaking to Israel in the 4 Gospels.
What the text of Romans 11:25 states is:Paul told us in romans 11:25 that The tribulation has not begun and will not until the fullness of the gentiles come in
What the text of Romans 11:25 states is:
For I do not want you to be ignorant, brothers and sisters, of this mystery, so that you may not be wise in yourselves: A hardening in part has happened to Israel, until the fullness of the Gentiles may come in.
.....the text the continues and says:
and in this way all Israel will be saved. As it is written: "The deliverer will come from Zion; he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.This is about a redefinition of Israel becoming the faithful remnant from Jacob + the faithful Gentiles coming together in the New Covenant.
Those that were under the Old Covenant that rejected the offer of the New Covenant remained under the Law (and were condemned to death, as that's what the Law did....it was ultimately death for all who sin...which included everyone but Jesus). Before the judgement on Jerusalem and the complete removal of the Kingdom of God from the apostate religious leaders....Israel was a mixture of corruption and faithful people. But once the destruction of 70 AD occurred....God then only had faithful "priests on earth " representing Him (All Israel was saved then). Paul directly stated what this mystery was in Ephesians.
Ephesians 3:6
This mystery is that the Gentiles are fellow heirs, members of the same body, and partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel.
What did Jesus say, according to His doctrine?
Mat 21:33 Hear another parable: There was a certain householder, which planted a vineyard, and hedged it round about, and digged a winepress in it, and built a tower, and let it out to husbandmen, and went into a far country:
Mat 21:34 And when the time of the fruit drew near, he sent his servants to the husbandmen, that they might receive the fruits of it.
Mat 21:35 And the husbandmen took his servants, and beat one, and killed another, and stoned another.
Mat 21:36 Again, he sent other servants more than the first: and they did unto them likewise.
Mat 21:37 But last of all he sent unto them his son, saying, They will reverence my son.
Mat 21:38 But when the husbandmen saw the son, they said among themselves, This is the heir; come, let us kill him, and let us seize on his inheritance.
Mat 21:39 And they caught him, and cast him out of the vineyard, and slew him.
Mat 21:40 When the lord therefore of the vineyard cometh, what will he do unto those husbandmen?
Mat 21:41 They say unto him, He will miserably destroy those wicked men, and will let out his vineyard unto other husbandmen, which shall render him the fruits in their seasons.
Mat 21:42 Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Mat 21:43 Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.
See 1 Peter 2:4-10 for the nation to which the kingdom is given.
.
Neither are we nor is God.That is your interpretation, but I am not into replacement theology.
Neither are we nor is God.
He has only ever had one people; all the people who believe in Him and keep His Commandments.
Why must you harp on about RT, something that no-one I know promotes.
It is you who demands a Two People, Two Promises theology. The Jewish people Redeemed and the faithful Church separate.
That idea is not Biblical and cannot happen.
I am asking you when did the change happen.
Are you saying it began in Matthew 1, or Matthew 21? Make it clear please.
Let me make this crystal clear. What I say means nothing.
What did Jesus say in Matthew 21:43?
.............................................
Are you an advocate of "Replacement Theology", based on the following questions?
Have you replaced the one people of God, with two peoples of God in John 10:16?
Have you replaced the one seed, with the many seeds in Galatians 3:16?
Have you replaced the one Gospel, with two Gospels?
Have you replaced the children of the promise, with the children of the flesh in Romans 9:8?
Have you ignored the word "now" in Hebrews 8:6?
.