The possibility of there being a real mark of the beast.
Written by Russ Campbell, parts from Google, parts from
www.yourstrawman.com Note that this website is for information only, I do not endorse any part of it at all, except for Big corporations running Govenments all around the world…
June 3 2017 11:17 AM
It is important to note that the previous document posted has important information that is included in this newer document, including a biblical definition of not only the beast but the mark of the beast, but still right or wrong about the mark of the beast we must be prepared to say that we are not citizens of this earth but that we are citizens of The Kingdom of God and we had better back it up with the bible…..thus we are not subject to the law of the land when it comes to same sex marriage, or abortion and any law that is passed to thwart our freedom as Christians. That does not mean that we are not to LOVE people and God respectively, but we CAN and WILL HAVE to pick and choose which laws we have to obey as Citizens of the Kingdom of God, can I make one question: instead of calling ourselves Christians we should be calling ourselves Citizens of The Kingdom Of God….period…
I have come up with the following document through study of the Bible, current events, key items in the bible as related to this, and common sense. Would someone please prove me wrong here, this whole thing is based on Christianity, and the words Of Jesus. I carefully looked up each item of scripture to back up what I have written. I hope to God that I am wrong.
Today I am going to talk about the mark of the beast and the Kingdom of God.
Did you know that every Government in this world controls how we buy and sell goods? Well I will tell you that world government is already here, they just don't want you to know that. And the Kingdom of God is already here, Satan does not want you to know that. It started when the thief was told that Today You Will be With Me In Paradise, He was not talking about heaven but The Kingdom Of God.
It gets worse: the bible says that there will be lots of those that have the mark of the beast; we all already have had that ever since government started to control us.
But be glad, there is a way out: as Christians, we can say to the government, that it says in the Bible that we are not from this world; in fact we are from The Kingdom of God. Watch God is Not Dead 2 to see how a teacher won a case of being fired for answering a question about Jesus, went to court and won the case which simply stated that she was on trial for being a Christian.
But be forewarned: to do this you will come up against lots of opposition: Stand your ground and insist that we Christians are indeed from the Kingdom of God.
May God be with you all who read and understand this, and especially those of you who act on it.
I back up all of the above with scripture: First the Broad Way To Destruction and The Narrow Road:
Matthew 7:13 Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide IS the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in therat:
Matthew 7:14 Because strait IS the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there that find it.
The false prophets:
Matthew 7:15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits... read the rest and apply that to Governments around the world....
The Kingdom of God:
Matthew 6:33 But seek ye first the kingdom of God, and his righteousness; and all these things shall be added unto you.
The Kingdom of God is Not of this World
John 18:36 Jesus answered, My Kingdom is not of this world
The thief on the cross:
Luke 23:42 And he said unto Jesus, Lord remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom. 43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, today shalt thou be with me in paradise.
And lastly the mark of the beast
Revelation of
John 19:20 Also read Revelation of John 16
and the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshiped his image. Those both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
The following I got from Google, further making an argument for my premise…
Bible prophesy describes a powerful leader and his government or empire as the beast. God’s people won’t accept the mark of the Beast and will not be permitted to engage in commerce. What is this mark?s government or empire as the Be' of the Beast and will not be
“The second beast of Revelation 13 will cause ‘all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name’ (Revelation 13:16-17).
Comment: No wonder that Satan is trying to stop the spread of Christianity at all costs, the Revelation of
John 19:20-21 has yet to happen, and Satan knows that not only is his time short, but so may also be our time short.....if this ever meant a reason to become a Christian and quickly , as you never know when Jesus is coming back, and I am right this might mean that every man woman and child of THIS World of Man is in for big troubles, boy did Jesus ever mean
Matthew 7:13......
More about the Kingdom of God and the mark of the beast: This clinches it!
Matthew 19 : 24 And again I say Unto you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the Kingdom of God, folks He meant this literally.....Governments are controlled by rich men and banks are controlled by rich men, that is proven by the bank’s profits ....with both that is the mark of the beast.
I am afraid that this will anger some Islamic people regardless of how nice they are to us Christians, Satan is only trying to pull the wool over our eyes.... but no more ...
For more information go to:
What Is the Mark of the Beast Talked About in the Book of Revelation?
The following information comes from the website
www.yourstrawman.com, I am including the parts that are true:
Meet Your Strawman
This is a picture of "The Houses of Parliament" in London, England.
Let's have a little quiz:
1. Who meets there?
2. What do they do there?
3. Do they help you in any way?
If your answers were:
1. "Members of the government"
2. "They represent all the people living in the country" and
3. "Yes, they create laws to protect me and my family"
Then let me congratulate you on getting every one of the answers wrong.
Didn't do too well on that quiz? OK, let's have another go:
4. When was slavery abolished?
5. Was slavery legal?
6. Are you in debt to a financial institution?
Here are the answers:
1. The serving officers of a commercial company.
2. They think up ways to take money and goods from you.
3. No, absolutely not, they help themselves and not you.
4. Slavery has NEVER been abolished and you yourself, are considered to be a slave right now.
5. Yes, slavery is "legal" although it is not "lawful" (you need to discover the difference).
6. No. You are NOT in debt to any financial institution.
TThis is all correct except for #6, you have to pay your debts…
There is more: Not all of it is correct, yes there IS a strawman, but you can’t use that knowledge to get out of paying what you have legally bought But on the other hand paying a fine for something that you as a Christian do not agree with is a different story…
If nobody has told that you that you have a Strawman, then this could be a very interesting experience for you. Your Strawman was created when you were very young, far too young to know anything about it. But then, it was meant to be a secret as it's purpose is to swindle you, and it has been used very effectively to do just that ever since it was created.
Perhaps it is about time that you learnt about your strawman and how you can stop it being used against you. Knowing about it is the most important first step. You need to go on a journey of discovery, and I'm afraid that what you are about to discover is not very pleasant. However, if you decide to act on what you learn, it could change your life for the better. If you think that you are in debt, then you can get out of it if you are willing to stand up for your rights and refuse to be swindled any longer. Interested? If so, then let's start at the beginning and find out where your strawman came from and why you should care about it.
It all started when your parents had a happy event and you entered the world. You don't know exactly when that was, because you were not aware of the days of the week, the months of the year or even what year it was.
Even after some months had gone by, you still were not aware of these things, but by that time, your strawman had already been created and it was being used to make some very unscrupulous people rich. None of this was your fault. It happened because your parents were fooled into thinking that they needed to register your birth and get a birth certificate for you. So, they APPLIED for a birth certificate, not understanding what would happen when they did. Well then, what did happen? According to the Local Authority:
1. They lost ownership of their baby (you).
2. They allowed a strawman to be created.
This is not something which they can be blamed for, as nobody told them it would, or even could, happen. Nor did anybody tell them what a strawman is or how it can be used against their baby. In actual fact, the “registration” is a contract and in reality, it is null and void because there was not full disclosure by the Local Authority, nor was there ‘intent to contract’ on the part of the parents.
Tricia corrects this information, stating: “There is no “application” for a Birth Certificate. The State creates one no matter what, with or without any parent providing information. The paper on which they provide information is called an information sheet, not an application. The parent signs only as informant, not as any applicant. The baby is not registered at all. Only the birth event is registered which is the birthing of the new fictitious entity Name being created by the State.
The State then issues you a certified COPY of the original which the State keeps as legal title to that fictitious entity Name. You merely USE the State owned legal “person” to conduct any commerce within the State regulated legal system of commerce, all of which is just fiction. Even when the parent signed as informant, that was not their signature they signed, but the signature for the fiction Name the State owns and created after they were born.
Everyone who has a copy of the birth certificate is authorised by the State to USE the State property Name and authorised to sign that Name FOR that Name. Everything you USE that Name for is all liability of the State. It is their property. They hold original legal title to it. The only reason everyone has problems from using that Name is only because they BELIEVE that is their property. So they make CLAIMS to that Name because of merely BELIEVING that is their property which is actually a false claim they make against State owned property.
Any time a CLAIM is made in any court that claim MUST be bonded or insured. So your CLAIM becomes your CONSENT where you pledge your body and/or property as your bond/insurance as surety against your CLAIM. When you lose they take your body and put it in jail while their bond created cures or they take your property to pay your loss in court for YOUR claim which you made!
If you use their property Name properly and do not claim it or anything registered in that Name, then they have no consent from you and no claim by you and the State then must settle any claim against their property Name. It is as simple as that…. Any time a names has a Last Name included that is a fiction name. There is no last name for living men or women, ONLY a given name, first-middle. So unless there is ONLY a first-middle name where NO last name exists at all, then the name is not for a man or woman. It does not matter how it spelled at all. It only matters whether it includes a last name or not. That is what the difference between a name for a living being and a fiction name. You will not find a Birth Certificate that does not have a Last Name. …
In fact, no name can BE the human. The human can only be CALLED BY a name. James is the name the human would be called by. There is no last name attached. The only way to properly refer to a human by a name is where you would have write, the man called by James. Man is man and woman is woman no matter what. Man is not James. Woman is not Jane. Man is only called by James and woman is only called by Jane.
James Martin or Jane Martin is fiction and has nothing at all to do with a living man or woman …. Of course, when one actually KNOWS THYSELF, then they know all those codes and statutes and their definitions are not important at all because they know none of it applies to them anyway. They don’t even volunteer any more as a participant to that fictitious Law Society because they know that it has nothing to do with them and they are not a party to it.” See YouTube which explains this. There is a good video on birth certificates here
So, what is a strawman? A strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope that as the child grows up, he will be fooled into believing that he is actually the strawman (which he most definitely is not) and pay all sorts of imaginary costs and liabilities which get attached to the strawman by con artists.
How is a strawman created? Well the mechanism involves that unnecessary birth certificate which the parents imagine is about, and belongs to, their baby (neither of which is actually true). If the baby has been named James and the family name is Martin, then you would expect the birth certificate to have the name James Martin written on it. If that is what is written on it, then all is well and it is a genuine birth certificate. However, if any other name is there, then the document is not a birth certificate but instead is the creation of a strawman masquerading as James Martin. The alternative entries might be any of the following examples: "JAMES MARTIN", "Mr James Martin", "Martin, Mr James" or anything else which is not exactly "James Martin" and nothing else.
Why create a strawman? The answer is 'in order to charge the strawman imaginary costs and penalties and fool the human James Martin into paying those amounts'. These imaginary charges include 'Income Tax', 'Council Tax', 'Inheritance Tax', 'Capital-Gains Tax', 'Road Tax', 'Import Tax', 'Value-Added Tax', 'Fuel Levy', 'Loan Interest', 'Bank Charges' and anything else that full-time professionals can think up and are confident that you will not notice that you never agreed to pay and don't need to pay.
Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to cheat you and rob you.
For example, they will say to you "Do you understand?" . In English, that means "Do you comprehend what I am saying to you?" and the automatic response would be "Yes", meaning "I do comprehend what you are saying to me". But these sneaky, underhand people have changed the meaning in Legalese to mean "Do you stand under me?" meaning "Do you grant me authority over you so that you have to obey whatever I tell you to do?".
What makes it even worse, is the fact that they will never tell you that they have switched from English to Legalese, and if that is not dishonest, underhand and unscrupulous, then I don't know what is! If you answer the question believing that English is being spoken, then they pretend that you are contracting with them to become subordinate to them. Whether or not that is actually true is debatable because that is effectively a verbal contract between you and them and for any contract to be valid, there has to be full and open disclosure of all of the terms of the contract, and then, unreserved acceptance by both parties, and in these cases, that has most definitely, not occurred.
But what is the point in all this? Well, this manoeuvre is intended to trick you into agreeing to represent your strawman. Why? Aaah now, that is a good question, but to answer it takes a bit of explaining, and you need to understand the overall situation:
All humans are born equal, with complete freedom of choice and action. If you live in the same place as a lot of other people, then there are a few restrictions which have grown up, by common consent, over time. These restrictions are for your protection and the protection of the other people living near you. These restrictions are called "the Law" (or more accurately: "Common Law") and they are few in number and very easy to understand. They are:
You must not injure or kill anyone.
You must not steal or damage things owned by somebody else.
You must be honest in your dealings and not swindle anyone.
These have resulted from hundreds of years of disputes which have been dealt with through using common sense and the opinions of ordinary people. They are the only limitations on you, and if you don't want to abide by them, then you need to go to some isolated place and stay away from other people.
Many people think that there are hundreds of other laws which they have to keep (and new ones every other day), but that is not so. Those other things are called "statutes" and keeping them is optional for you, the human, BUT they are not optional for your fictitious strawman, and that is why the people who benefit from those things want to persuade you to represent your strawman and so become subject to all of their invented restrictions and charges.
If you knew that they were optional, would you agree to:
- Give most of your earnings away in taxes and similar charges
- Pay to drive on roads which were built with your money?
- Be forced to join armed services if you are told to?
- Send an army which is supposed to represent you, into another country to murder innocent people there?
Were you ever told that these things are optional? If you agree to represent your strawman, then these things become binding on you. These are some of the "statutes" which 'politicians' keep inventing in order to make you poor, make them and their friends rich, and keep you in a position where you have to do everything they say, no matter how much that harms you and does away with your natural rights and freedom.
But, says somebody, we elect a government to represent us and so we have to do what they say, after all, they have our best interests at heart don't they?
Well, that is a nice thought, but is it actually true? No it isn't. You think that you elect politicians to represent you in your government, but that is not what you actually do. That is part of a very carefully fostered illusion intended to keep you in your place and giving most of your earnings away (typically, 80% of all you earn). Part of the secret is that what is supposed to be your 'government' is actually a privately owned, for-profit company and all that you do when voting, is help choose the serving officers inside that company. It will never make the slightest difference to what happens in the future as the company policy and actions are controlled by the owners of the company and they are not influenced in any way whatsoever by what you want.
Think this is far fetched? Then check it out via Dun & Bradstreet or any of the other places which records the setting up and performance of the 160,000,000 commercial companies world-wide. When you do that, you will discover that, for example, the House of Commons is a commercial for-profit company (number UC2279443), The Labour Party is a commercial company which trades under the name of “Allister Darling MP”, The House of Lords which is the highest court in the land is a private company, the United Kingdom Corporation Ltd. formerly known as the “United Kingdom plc” and which never complied with the law which requires it to file it's financial records, is also a private company. The Ministry of Justice D-U-N-S Number 22-549-8526, Directors: Lord Falconer of Thoroton is a private company set up in the year 1600. The Bank of England is a private company, as is every Court and every Police Force and even the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry is a company and not a person.
It gets even more ridiculous when you discover that The Devon and Cornwall Police is a company which has been taken over by a company owned by IBM which is paid an annual budget of £256,800,000 taken from members of the public. Gilbert and Sullivan would have loved this reality as a script for one of their comedies. Lancashire County Council was incorporated as a company (IP00666C) in 2002. It’s registered office was "3rd Floor, Christ Church Precinct, County Hall, Preston" and it was completely dissolved on 25th January 2008 and all of it’s Assets and Liabilities were transferred on 12th November 2007 to another company - “The Blues and Twos Credit Union Ltd.” whose registered address is Lancashire Police Headquarters, PO Box 77, Hutton, Preston. Do you by any chance get the feeling that you are being taken for a ride here?
There is more than 51 pages in the original document written by John Harris, He was murdered for exposing this, it is now common knowledge….I will leave it up to you the reader to decide about all of it, Russ Campbell
I have included the important parts of
www.yourstrawman.com go to the link shown for more information, but be forewarned a lot of it is not true, anything that says you can beat the system is utter garbage….
