Could the fall of morals from the 1960s to now have been avoided?

[D.A. Wright]

Which morals exactly do you mean? The ones where women were suppressed? Were black people were treated as second class citizens?

Don't bother to answer. It's obvious you mean sex. It's always about sex.

How is it obvious?

 

[Occams Barber]

Do you think the relative freefall of morality that started around the 1960s could have been avoided? How in what kind of way?

I also don't believe we should go back to before the 1960s in all ways, but I believe the traditionalists and conservatives have a point sometimes.

I agree that Christian morality has declined over the last several decades - but not in the way Christians imagine it. As a group (there are exceptions) Christian moral standards, compared to those of society in general, leave a lot to be desired.

Poor Christian behaviour includes:

• Employment discrimination based on gender
  
• Discrimination based on sexual orientation
  
• Demanding the right to refuse service to certain groups (a variant on sexual orientation discrimination)
  
• Demanding the right to have its Creation Myth taught as science
  
• Demanding (and getting) the right to not report child abuse
• A belief that it is sometimes above the law
  
• Openly practising misogyny
  
• Vilifying homosexuals
  
• Expecting a special exemption from taxation
  
• Insulting other religions
• Science denial

Perhaps Christianity should put it's own house in order?
OB

 

[D.A. Wright]

Morals are doing just fine.

Is this sarcasm? Just curious.

 

[timothyu]

Drugs came into America via the Vietnam war. This is where innocence started to diminish.

Became more popular. Weed and acid were around before, acid being used by both military and psychiatry. 70 or so years later both are being used medicinally again. Alcohol remains safe in the hearts of America as the profitable drug of choice.

 

[hedrick]

Is this sarcasm? Just curious.

Absolutely not

 

[D.A. Wright]

What fallen morality? Treatment of minorities is better. Violent crime is down. Divorce is down (so are marriage rates). Interracial marriage is accepted by the vast majority. What's the problem?

Yeah, it's pretty easy to avoid divorce if you bypass the whole marriage thing. I feel like I'm losing my mind, reading some of these comments. My wife has, for the last 10 years, worked in the legal department of a county children and youth services department. Every (reported) ugly thing that happens to a child comes across her desk in all of its gory detail. Let me assure you that unless this county is a glaring anomaly, there is definitely a major problem. More could be said here, but my brain hurts.

 

[hedrick]

Yeah, it's pretty easy to avoid divorce if you bypass the whole marriage thing. I feel like I'm losing my mind, reading some of these comments. My wife has, for the last 10 years, worked in the legal department of a county children and youth services department. Every (reported) ugly thing that happens to a child comes across her desk in all of its gory detail. Let me assure you that unless this county is a glaring anomaly, there is definitely a major problem. More could be said here, but my brain hurts.

Let me remind you that 100 years ago her office wouldn't have existed. Of course things aren't perfect. But at least now these kinds of things are recognized and we're trying to deal with them.

 

[D.A. Wright]

I agree that Christian morality has declined over the last several decades - but not in the way Christians imagine it. As a group (there are exceptions) Christian moral standards, compared to those of society in general, leave a lot to be desired.

Poor Christian behaviour includes:

• Employment discrimination based on gender
  
• Discrimination based on sexual orientation
  
• Demanding the right to refuse service to certain groups (a variant on sexual orientation discrimination)
  
• Demanding the right to have its Creation Myth taught as science
  
• Demanding (and getting) the right to not report child abuse
• A belief that it is sometimes above the law
  
• Openly practising misogyny
  
• Vilifying homosexuals
  
• Expecting a special exemption from taxation
  
• Insulting other religions
• Science denial

Perhaps Christianity should put it's own house in order?
OB

And, without addressing each (logically fallacious) hastily-generalized item, I could suggest that perhaps atheism-at-large could reconsider the folly of attributing these problems to everyone but themselves and perpetuating the myth (at least to themselves) that they are, in lockstep fashion, above human flaws and evils.

 

[timothyu]

Let me remind you that 100 years ago her office wouldn't have existed. Of course things aren't perfect. But at least now these kinds of things are recognized and we're trying to deal with them.

Didn't have to worry about the kids back then. They were off the streets and out of harm's way, working in factories and fields.

 

[SoldierOfTheKing]

I agree that Christian morality has declined over the last several decades - but not in the way Christians imagine it. As a group (there are exceptions) Christian moral standards, compared to those of society in general, leave a lot to be desired.

Poor Christian behaviour includes:

• Employment discrimination based on gender
  
• Discrimination based on sexual orientation
  
• Demanding the right to refuse service to certain groups (a variant on sexual orientation discrimination)
  
• Demanding the right to have its Creation Myth taught as science
  
• Demanding (and getting) the right to not report child abuse
• A belief that it is sometimes above the law
  
• Openly practising misogyny
  
• Vilifying homosexuals
  
• Expecting a special exemption from taxation
  
• Insulting other religions
• Science denial

Perhaps Christianity should put it's own house in order?
OB

The church ought to allow herself to be judged morally by the standards of the world?

 

[Tinker Grey]

The church ought to allow herself to be judged morally by the standards of the world?

Well, if the church had any standards, we might use those.

 

[com7fy8]

If immoral people knew about that, why couldn't moral people? Why do only immoral people get to be in those fields? That's another crazy thing I think isn't fair.

I have a theory that it's because we were too willing to turn the other cheek and be non-agressive.

My opinion > if the conservative church culture thing worked, morals would not have gone downhill. Why would this be, that church culture did not work? Possibly, the parents were not deeply strong and satisfied in living God's love; and so they were outwardly conforming and getting along socially, but not deeply sharing with God. And so, when younger ones tried to do the outward cultural things, they discovered how they were not being deeply satisfied and they were not deeply strong against worry and unforgiveness and getting hurt in arguing and complaining. So, they looked elsewhere to get real and deep satisfaction.

And ones doing this, of course, without Jesus, have not gotten "rest for your souls." (in Matthew 11:28-30) But they did go elsewhere because the culture thing was not getting them sweet and intimate with God in Jesus Christ's rest. Plus, what they did with themselves also has not worked.

If what we are doing doesn't work, it can be because it does not work.

 

[timothyu]

if the conservative church culture thing worked, morals would not have gone downhill.

Fear left the church to be the CEO of governments.

 

[pc_76]

What fallen morality? Treatment of minorities is better. Violent crime is down. Divorce is down (so are marriage rates). Interracial marriage is accepted by the vast majority. What's the problem?

Depends, because one person or minorities better treatment can be another's mis-treatment and attack. Just saying, can there be anything in the middle where both are satisfied? Maybe. I didn't say we should bring everything back to that time either, I was saying that there were some things that we lost that turned out to be good for us.

 

[D.A. Wright]

Let me remind you that 100 years ago her office wouldn't have existed.

Aren't we lucky? What a patronizing tone you wield. Let me remind you that 100 years ago, it was the church that labored hardest for the widows and the fatherless. Drug-addicted babies from childbirth out-of-wedlock had not yet become the golden standard of society.

 

[D.A. Wright]

Of course things aren't perfect.

I can't even comment on this one; perhaps your communications device has been commandeered by a secular humanist. If that is the case, please accept my apologies for misquoting you.

 

[D.A. Wright]

But at least now these kinds of things are recognized and we're trying to deal with them.

Yes, of course, Big Brother has come to the rescue. Don't let the paved roads and the coffee shops with free wi-fi fool you, for:

Be alert and of sober mind. Your enemy the devil prowls around like a roaring lion looking for someone to devour. (1 Peter 5:8)

While people are saying, "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman (gradually, with increasing intensity and frequency, perhaps?), and they will not escape. (1 Thessalonians 5:3)

"...woe to the earth and the sea, because the devil has gone down to you! He is filled with fury, because he knows that his time is short." (Revelation 12:12)

 

[Occams Barber]

The church ought to allow herself to be judged morally by the standards of the world?

It's not a question of allow - the Church is being judged by society's standards whether you like it or not.

The Church doesn't own the patent on morality. There are other moral standards apart from those specific to Christianity.
OB

 

[Occams Barber]

And, without addressing each (logically fallacious) hastily-generalized item,

Hasty? Not really. I started a discussion on this very topic a few weeks ago.
Christian Privilege

I could suggest that perhaps atheism-at-large could reconsider the folly of attributing these problems to everyone but themselves and perpetuating the myth (at least to themselves) that they are, in lockstep fashion, above human flaws and evils.

This isn't an atheist issue. We have two moral systems clashing ; one belonging to Christianity and the other owned by the broader society. By society's moral standards Christianity sometimes behaves badly.
OB

 

[D.A. Wright]

It's not a question of allow - the Church is being judged by society's standards whether you like it or not.

The Church doesn't own the patent on morality. There are other moral standards apart from those specific to Christianity.
OB

Society's standards change. Morals do not.