Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Again, thank you for the QED.
Poor AV, he does not realize that if Hovind indeed was a liar and a scoundrel and a crooked tax cheat who preaches for money and not for Jesus that he would be exactly where he is today.
So AV, what evidence do you have to counter any of my claims?
None.
You know he is a liar. He can't "debate" without lying.
You know he is a convicted tax cheat. He thought he could get away with his nonsense and found out he couldn't.
You do know that the IRS does not really want to put anyone behind bars. If you pay the tax you owe, plus moderate penalties for breaking the law, they will let you go. Hovind was not even smart enough to cut a deal. The thought of all of that money made him crazy and greedy.
My point is that Mr. Hovind uses a giant screen to justify what he is saying.
Can you do otherwise with the same points he makes?
Again, thank you for the QED.
I've told you before, we only shoot the messenger if the messenger deliberately gives false information,I wonder if evolutionists shoot the messenger because creationists say evolution comes from the Devil, then shoot the devil?
Kent Hovind is a known criminal serving time. This man sold religion like it was a commodity. He has no scruples when it comes to bearing false witness! This is a man with no morals and a worshipper of Mammon!I've told you before, we only shoot the messenger if the messenger deliberately gives false information,
Kent Hovine specialises in giving false information, he's well known for it, everyone knows it's his trademark,
the only people who don't laugh at Kent Hovine are creationists, he plays on this and laughs all the way to the bank.
Oh is he on youtube?
If you have genuinely never heard of Kent Hovine I apologise for speaking out of turn.Thanks AV. I find it troubling that he has been sent to prison for tax evasion. I understand that people can and do make mistakes and do wrong, but when you are a person who makes their lives open to the public it is paramount to be as much as a reflection of Christ as humanly possible. So that is a somewhat quick response to some of the links that came up. I haven't listened to the video yet because I have my family around and they hate when I play them while watching t.v.
Here is a sentence after sentence analysis of a Hovind debate.Even if he was lying ... and in no way do I believe he was ...
But even if he was lying, he puts contradictions and errors right up on a giant projector and highlights them, citing the sources for everyone to check for themselves.
In doing so, he gets called a "liar."
Evolutionists use his conviction in non-theological matters as a smoke screen to mask his actual points.
My point is that Mr. Hovind uses a giant screen to justify what he is saying.
Can you do otherwise with the same points he makes?
Just a quick question for the OP: Are you implying that Einstein came up with the Big Bang Theory?
How can he give false information when he's got a school textbook up on a giant screen with things in it even you guys would disagree with?I've told you before, we only shoot the messenger if the messenger deliberately gives false information,
And what is on the screen is what kids are being taught in school today.Yet, what he says and what is (was) on the screen are lies.
He says one thing that's true along with twenty lies, that's an old con trick, that way no one can say it's all lies.How can he give false information when he's got a school textbook up on a giant screen with things in it even you guys would disagree with?
Then let a 10-year old just stand there and click the images on the screen and not say anything at all.He says one thing that's true along with twenty lies, that's an old con trick, that way no one can say it's all lies.
Then why is Kent Hovine used to beat creationists? you don't need me to tell you he tells lies check it out for yourself,
you won't because you want to believe what he says is true and the very last thing you want is to find out he's a liar,
you would rather lie to yourself, you're trapped in your bubble and you can't escape.
http://www.christianforums.com/t796091/#post9058379Fine ... then you stand there and explain the images he shows on that giant screen pertaining to school (and college) textbooks.
So basically, you're saying I can't be trusted to accept certain things now because I might learn they are wrong in the future?
Isn't that the exact same argument creationists like AV use against the scientific method? "Science has been wrong about things before, so all current scientific knowledge is unreliable because it might be disproven tomorrow".
(I only just found this post!)
The Bible's literal content will tend towards the amount that is truly literally accurate. If some of it is literally true (there was indeed a country called Egypt ruled by Pharaohs), then that part will remain literal. The extraneous parts will be relegated to metaphor/exaggeration, but some will remain literal.
So Genesis 1 is metaphorical because it turns out to be factually incorrect. This doesn't mean it 'becomes' metaphorical, but rather that it was always metaphorical - we just didn't know it. All verses/stories are taken as a 'dunno' until we can conclude they're literal or not. If they contradict reality, we can make that decision.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?