Well PaladinValor... looks as if you are left on your own here.... your stance seems to be of the minority. In our few encounters we never seem to agree... strange.
The misunderstanding that took place in this thread earlier was in the fact that modern Christianity wasn't always a religion, as far as the term goes today ,The Way was and has been classified as a movement. With Christianity's roots found in Judaism, many believed they, The people of the Movement called The Way, were not a new religion at all, ... yet time tells a different story, as does history... but being part of "Christianity" to those of The Way, meant a relationship more then a modern day definition of the religion called Christianity. They are married (taking in Mr LaFrances' analogy) to each other. I was not trying to divorce the two, quite the opposite as I was showing they can not be divorced. We have no choice but to be Christian today, and identified as one, and have a meaningful relationship through faith encompassed in the religion called Christianity. (well, we have a choice on the last one.)
I apologize but I still hold to the fact that in the midst of conversation between fellow believers, the phrase "Christianity is a relationship" is not an error, nor a possible "practiced" doctrine, and not even close to its own theology, nor is it an extremely modern idea. To treat it as a religion or relationship solely IMO the real error.
Good luck to you brother, I hope you find that a relationship resides in the religion.
Warrior Poet