Continuation of Enoch's Intercalary Lunar Months

[Humble Penny]

The only thing that is exposed or unravelled is that your calendar drifts and I haven't seen a proposal on how it's synchronized back to the tropical year unless I have missed it through all these personal attacks.

Shalom

Your calendar drifts.
Shalom

Please...you already know where I stand on calendars from my thread below:

Can a Calendar Be Used Prior to the Time of Its Inception?

And for you to use the Julian Calendar when you know that the Gregorian Calendar is what is actually being used is pretty funny and hilarious. But I get you had to do that in order to hide you cooking the books on your false tables.

Our recent exchanges from posts #34 thru #49 will show where I expose your underhanded tricks.

 

[Filippus]

Please...you already know where I stand on calendars from my thread below:

Can a Calendar Be Used Prior to the Time of Its Inception?

And for you to use the Julian Calendar when you know that the Gregorian Calendar is what is actually being used is pretty funny and hilarious. But I get you had to do that in order to hide you cooking the books on your false tables.

Our recent exchanges from posts #34 thru #49 will show where I expose your underhanded tricks.

Exactly that you always avoid the question.
Shalom

 

[Humble Penny]

Please...you already know where I stand on calendars from my thread below:

Can a Calendar Be Used Prior to the Time of Its Inception?

And for you to use the Julian Calendar when you know that the Gregorian Calendar is what is actually being used is pretty funny and hilarious. But I get you had to do that in order to hide you cooking the books on your false tables.

Our recent exchanges from posts #34 thru #49 will show where I expose your underhanded tricks.

Exactly that you always avoid the question.
Shalom

@Filippus My OP clearly shows I am not using any man made calendars to arrive at my current conclusion so you creating your tables with one to make it seem as if that's what I'm claiming in my tables is nothing less than snakish behavior. May the Lord rebuke you and anyone else who thinks to try the same behavior.

 

[Humble Penny]

Dear Readers,

Look at the clear differences in the headings of the columns in my tables and those of Filippus:

Humble Penny (No Man-made Calendars)

Filippus (Includes Julian Calendar)

My tables only use a Solar Calendar of 360 Days with 4 Seasonal/Intercalary Days, and a Lunar Calendar with 354 Days. Neither of the calendars on my chart follow any man made systems, but instead align with what one plainly reads in Genesis 1:1-2:3, the Dead Sea Scrolls Mishmarot A (4Q320), 1 Enoch, and Jubilees. And the thread post below shows I don't believe in any man-made calendars are ever used or supported by the Bible:

Can a Calendar Be Used Prior to the Time of Its Inception?

Also look at what Filippus trys to claim deceptively here:

Solar 8 is adding a leap month synchronizing it every 8 years.
After 24 years you will require 30 days.

So where is the falsehood?

Shalom

Is this true? No because in my first quote on post #37 I show how he actually inserts a leap month a total of 9 Times every 1-3 Years instead of 3 Times every 8 Years like he tries try to make it seem in his table below:

 

[Filippus]

Dear Readers,

Look at the clear differences in the headings of the columns in my tables and those of Filippus:

Humble Penny (No Man-made Calendars)
View attachment 313025
View attachment 313026

Filippus (Includes Julian Calendar)
View attachment 313027
View attachment 313028

My tables only use a Solar Calendar of 360 Days with 4 Seasonal/Intercalary Days, and a Lunar Calendar with 354 Days. Neither of the calendars on my chart follow any man made systems, but instead align with what one plainly reads in Genesis 1:1-2:3, the Dead Sea Scrolls Mishmarot A (4Q320), 1 Enoch, and Jubilees. And the thread post below shows I don't believe in any man-made calendars are ever used or supported by the Bible:

Can a Calendar Be Used Prior to the Time of Its Inception?

Also look at what Filippus ttys to claim deceptively here:

Is this true? No because in my first quote on post #37 I show how he actually inserts a leap month a total of 9 Times every 1-3 Years instead of 3 Times every 8 Years like he tries try to make it seem in his table below:

View attachment 313029

30 days short.

Shalom

 

[Filippus]

@Filippus My OP clearly shows I am not using any man made calendars to arrive at my current conclusion so you creating your tables with one to make it seem as if that's what I'm claiming in my tables is nothing less than snakish behavior. May the Lord rebuke you and anyone else who thinks to try the same behavior.

Firstly I didn't claim it was a man made calendar.
Secondly for illustration purposes I showed you that it drifted 30 days, how is that even snakish behavior?

Are you saying we are not allowed to contribute, but listen only?

Shalom

 

[Humble Penny]

Solar 8 is adding a leap month synchronizing it every 8 years.
After 24 years you will require 30 days.

So where is the falsehood?

Shalom

View attachment 313024

30 days short.
View attachment 313030
Shalom

Lol! You're really hilarious with how desperate you are to save your hide. Let's look at more of your recent lies:

Original Table by Filippus

Second Table By Filippus

It's clear from these first two tables he wants to show my tables are off by 30 Days between the solar and lunar years after 24 Years. This he does by creating his own false tables which he highlights in Year 24, but these figures don't reflect the ones in my OP. Then after getting busted multiple times he now tries to show that he was showing a 30 Day discrepancy between his tables and the tables in my OP:

30 Days Short (By Filippus)

How did Filippus arrive at his conclusions? Simple he actually inserts a leap month a total of 9 Times every 1-3 Years instead of 3 Times every 8 Years like he tries try to make it seem in his tables above, and below are the calculations he used to pulled this off:

Filippus
Year 1 = 354 Days
Year 2 = 708 Days
Year 3 = 1,092 Days = 1,062 Days + 30 Days
Year 4 = 1,446 Days = 1,092 Days + 354 Days
Year 5 = 1,800 Days = 1,446 Days + 354 Days

Humble Penny
Year 1 = 354 Days
Year 2 = 708 Days
Year 3 = 1,062 Days
Year 4 = 1,416 Days
Year 5 = 1,800 Days = 1,770 Days + 30 Days

Aside from this error if one simply observes the solar and lunar years Filppus lists under these select years they'll notice the following oddities in his graph:

• Year 5 has a difference of 20 Days
• Year 10 has a difference of 10 Days
• Year 15 both days are even.
• Year 20 has a difference of 10 Days
• Year 24 has a difference of 30 Days

The only way for this to be possible is if Filippus added the intercalary Lunar months in the following way:

• 30 Days to Year 3
• 30 Days to Year 7
• 30 Days to Year 8
• 30 Days to Year 11
• 30 Days to Year 14
• 30 Days to Year 16
• 30 Days to Year 19
• 30 Days to Year 22
• 30 Days to Year 24

The following years shows Filippus having added 384 Lunar Days instead of 354 Lunar Days.

Firstly I didn't claim it was a man made calendar.
Secondly for illustration purposes I showed you that it drifted 30 days, how is that even snakish behavior?

Are you saying we are not allowed to contribute, but listen only?

Shalom

I said you deceptively inserted a man-made calendar and then tried to make it look like I did that with my tables in my OP. Anyone can contribute, I just don't like liars

 

[Humble Penny]

@Filipous this is dedicated for you:

Suzanne Basilicato
Cooking the Books - What Every Accountant Should Know - Video 1

 

[Filippus]

@Filipous this is dedicated for you:

Suzanne Basilicato
Cooking the Books - What Every Accountant Should Know - Video 1

You are only showing everyone how desperate you get when you have to make it personal to divert attention away from the discussion.

Why not just answer the question?

Shalom

 

[Humble Penny]

You are only showing everyone how desperate you get when you have to make it personal to divert attention away from the discussion.

Why not just answer the question?

Shalom

Post #55

 

[Joy]

MOD HAT ON

After Staff Review

This Thread
is Now
Permanently Closed

RV: Flaming and Goading

MOD HAT OFF​