Hey Smilin,
http://www.gisp2.sr.unh.edu/GISP2/DATA/fancy.html
Here is your link.
As to why I have not mentioned other ice-cores, it is because as far as I know most if not all of them have gone through numurous cycles of accumulation and thawing. This particular core is thought, by the scientists that drilled it, that it has never gone thorough a thaw cycle, so it is a continuous and contiguous record. Whereas the others are not.
So this is the one I first started with, and this is the one that shows the whole picture.
So I took this graph and placed it in CorelDRAW!, setting the leading edge at 12mm and the trailing edge at 6000mm, using 0mm as 2000 A.D. and 6000mm as 4000 B.C., adding the Hebrew dates to match the two calanders. Then I started plugging in dates, both from the Bible's account in Genesis and from currently accepted dates of events that would cause a great amount of dust to be thrown up into the atmosphere.
This graph shows the relative dust content in the atmosphere using the calcium contained in the ice.
The higher the spike in the graph, the higher the dust content.
A higher dust content means a colder climate, so the graph is also showing the climate and ice ages.
So what do you think I found that surprised me greatly?
Well, first the dates that I put in.
The birth years of Adams decendants, beginning with Adam and Eve in the year 0 of the Hebrew calander. so Seth was at 130H and so on. Year 1656H for the flood. and the birth year of Peleg, because it was in his days that the earth was divided. Babel, when God confounded language and speech and scattered the inhabitants abroad.
535 A.D., the eruption of Krakatoa volcano, which is known to have caused a worldwide climate shift, the 79 A.D. eruption of Vesuvius, and the 2209 B.C. passing of Hale-Bopp comet. Which was the last passing before the one in 1997-8 that the Hebrews thought could be the comet referred to in an old oral tradition that said when a comet comes out of Orion the end of the world is near. Hale-Bopp passed through Orion on it's way in.
Interestingly, Hale-Bopps passing in 2209 B.C. is 1551H, just 105 years before the flood of Noah.
And there is a lone spike in the graph at precisely this point. It is the third spike on the graph. So what I think happened is Hale-Bopp broke up and part either grazed the earth or impacted. And impact is more likely in my opinion judging from the spike.
And then Noah begins the construction of the ark and has his three boys within about five years.
Then 105 years after the passing of Hale-Bopp, the flood. No spike here, but that was a deluge, which would take dust out of the atmosphere.
Then around 150 years later another huge short lived spike. And this was at 1953 B.C., on my timeline of 6000 years. This is the third tallest spike on the graph.
Interestingly, Peleg, the guy in whose days the earth was divided, was about 50 years old, and the Chinese calander began in 1953 B.C., or 1807H.
Then all he** breaks loose, so to speak. The graph goes wild.
Huge and long lived spikes lasting 500 years, two in quick succession over that 500 years, indicating a major ice age.
The second tallest spike on the graph happens precisely at 535 A.D., the eruption of Krakatoa, which leveled the island and caused a worldwide climate change.
The tallest spike I have not identified, but it happened within about 100 years of the Krakatoa eruption. And current tree ring studies show that the dust event of 535 A.D. was actually a double event. But no one knows what that second event was, yet.
The 79 A.D. eruption of Vesuvius is also a spike on the graph. A small spike.
Around 1200-1300 A.D., again on my 6000 year timeline, the graph dies down to a very low level, indicating a calmer and warmer climate. And this level of dust is the lowest for the entire graph, and remained so until they drilled it in 1998.
And this is born out in our recorded history, and that is the time most of the scientific advances began to emerge. and for the past 800 years or so we have had the calmest and warmest climate in any time in past recorded history.
I place the leading edge of the graph at 12mm, because the drilling began in 1998, 12 years before 2000.
The trailing edge was put at 6000mm, just to see what would happen. Adam began to age at 3760 B.C., if we use the Hebrew calander as that guide. And Adam was already around for some time before he was split into Adam and Eve. So I just went back to 4000 B.C. as a starting point to line up the graph with a Biblical timeline.
Now, don't get me wrong here. I am not saying the earth is only 6000 years old, although that is a possibility. I really think the earth is much older. But as the dates all line up so perfectly, I think the ICE is only 6000 years old.
I have never changed the starting or ending points on the graph timeline to make things fit. It is just a straight one-to-one conversion with the dates mentioned. and everything I put in lines up EXACTLY.
Isaiah 24:1 Behold, the LORD maketh the earth empty, and maketh it waste, and turneth it upside down, and scattereth abroad the inhabitants thereof.
This verse is describing both the flood and a pole-shift of the planet.
The flood made the earth empty and waste. The pole-shift turned the world upside down and scattered the inhabitants abroad.
Abroad alright, all the way around the globe with the breaking up of the single continent that sent the land masses flying away from each other.
When they began to collide some of the highest mountain ranges were formed, and you can see this process clearly in the graph. Especially that first 500 years after Babel.
The flood did not cause the land masses to move, it was a PHYSICAL pole-shift of the planet. No one can argue that that event could have the necessary energy to get the land masses moving. I do not know what caused the shift in the first place, maybe God did it;-)
But the Bible is the only place that recorded it, as far as I know.
The land masses would have been moving at their fastest right after the shift, and they have slowed to the current rate that we see today.
The datings given for the graph by the scientists is roughly 110,000 years.
And when I did a bit of research into how they came up with that figure, I found that they choose between three best guess methods.
They guess, however, they do not KNOW.
And they are not into looking at things from a Biblical perspective, sad to say. The objectivity of scientists goes only so far.
1 John 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
And the Bible even says there is a witness in water, and I think ice qualifies as water. And I think this ice-core is the witness that God left that we were supposed to be looking for.
Is this enough for ANYONE to take an interest? Bear? Ocean?