A comment from PZ Meyers on the response to that bad article: Big fish on the hook. I repeat, BIG FISH.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I predicted that the creationist clickbait in the title of that stupid article about all animals originating at the same time would snag a few doofuses. I was right. Look who is tweeting about it: Eric Erickson and Ted Cruz.
You've heard of the harlot of Babylon?
Meet the harlot of London (evolution).
Then it can take a hike.
I don't respect science that doesn't respect the word of God.
QV my caption.If the word of God doesn't respect science, it can take a hike. Amen?
And sadly the media and the scientific community will ignore this.
Arguing this with a group of people who believe GENDER is a spectrum is pointless since they aren't even looking for facts at this point.
It's been widely known for a long time that we LOSE DNA information over time rather than gaining it.
Evolution has been proven false over and over again but is still being taught in schools.
Massive Genetic Study Reveals 90 Percent Of Earth’s Animals Appeared At The Same Time
This version of the information seems a little less ad crazy.
this looks like a link to the actual publication
https://phe.rockefeller.edu/news/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Stoeckle-Thaler-Final-reduced.pdf
Charles Darwin wouldn't even believe his own theory after this.
Ideas of panspermia have been advanced before in recognition of the problems surounding ND, however they only really push the issue away onto another planet, and in terms of the time available for advance life to evolve (on the other planet) make the problem worse.
There is no reason why the force, law or principle should not be evident at a subsequent time.The origin of life has no effect on the evolution of life after it got "started". Evolution only deals with extant, reproducing life that passes on genetic material to offspring.
All other forces, laws or principles recognised scientifically are evident and repeatable on a daily basis, and in fact the creative principle is also evident and repeatable (and repeated) many millions of times daily.
What force, law or principle? What makes you think anything other than the laws of chemistry -- which are indeed evident today -- was required? As for why we don't see life starting many times, there's a simple reason: living things are already around to gobble up pretty much anything that might form.There is no reason why the force, law or principle should not be evident at a subsequent time.
Well you won't see me complain about it, because I like to use gravity to make two points:Why isn't anyone here complaining about that?
It shows that atheism and evolutionism are both a religion; while showing that Christianity is not.Wut?
There is no reason why the force, law or principle should not be evident at a subsequent time.
All other forces, laws or principles recognised scientifically are evident and repeatable on a daily basis, and in fact the creative principle is also evident and repeatable (and repeated) many millions of times daily.
The supposed magic that gets the ball of evolution moving up mount improbable and leaping up every step on the way is not repeatable, not testable and its adherants deny it's falsifiability.
Cute.Is gravity a religion too?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?