Still false. The slave-holding states on the Union side continued to hold them longer than the Confederate ones were able to, and when Lincoln issued his famous Emancipation Proclamation it almost caused a rebellion in the North because his soldiers did not enlist in order to free slaves! Such was their POV.I don't want it both ways. BOTH the union and the South were abominable, but one was definitely more abominable than the other simply for the fact that one side did something about it, while the other side continued to hold on to the abomination - even compounding it.
Usually, or always?
Still false. The slave-holding states on the Union side continued to hold them longer than the Confederate ones were able to, and when Lincoln issued his famous Emancipation Proclamation it almost caused a rebellion in the North because his soldiers did not enlist in order to free slaves! Such was their POV.
Yet, the fact is that the Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave in the slave states that had remained in the Union. Lincoln, the so-called Great Emancipator, was very careful not to do that!
All celebrations have traditional social aspects.
...I'll help you. There is a parade in the South on Confederate Memorial Day. I think that's a bad thing, because that is a sort of "celebratory" event.
A proper memorial would include moments of silence, remembrance of Southerners who were punished for rebeling, black slaves who did good things, etc.
...Something people of all kinds can collectively take part in... But don't just be a destroyer... Be a fixer.
Did they rape their slaves, breed them with their parents and relatives so that they could produce stronger slaves, and publicly humiliate the males (buck breaking)?
Does it make it right, then, to celebrate a historic moment when those practices were considered the economic foundation of the region of celebration?
That's republicans for you, eh?Still false. The slave-holding states on the Union side continued to hold them longer than the Confederate ones were able to, and when Lincoln issued his famous Emancipation Proclamation it almost caused a rebellion in the North because his soldiers did not enlist in order to free slaves! Such was their POV.
Yet, the fact is that the Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave in the slave states that had remained in the Union. Lincoln, the so-called Great Emancipator, was very careful not to do that!
Buck breaking is a black supremacist myth. It didn't happen.
After noticing you posted this multiple times, I can only wonder why you appear fixated on public male rapes that didn't happen. I've got serious doubts about your in-breeding claims as well.
It isn't a black supremacist hoax. The slave owners raped their male and female slaves in public and private - but this wasn't an issue because they weren't considered human. They were property.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?