If things are suppose to evolve, how come computer etiquite seems to be so slow in evolving?
Fifteen or twenty years ago, when computer boards first started out there use to be what people called "flames". Back then, people who used computers were considered to be somewhat different in some way. But now computing and communication on computer boards has become main stream. But Miss Mannors has not come along yet and wrote a book on proper computer etiquite.
I wonder if we are long over due to establish some universal protocal on what is acceptable and what is not. What is acceptable and what is not acceptable has always been determined an a case by case bases by the people who had the ability to lock people out, without any real universal standard to go by. Traditionally, they make this decision based on how much the offending person agrees with them or not. For me things seem to be a bit more fair on this board, but I don't know, maybe the non christians would not agree with that.
Fifteen or twenty years ago, when computer boards first started out there use to be what people called "flames". Back then, people who used computers were considered to be somewhat different in some way. But now computing and communication on computer boards has become main stream. But Miss Mannors has not come along yet and wrote a book on proper computer etiquite.
I wonder if we are long over due to establish some universal protocal on what is acceptable and what is not. What is acceptable and what is not acceptable has always been determined an a case by case bases by the people who had the ability to lock people out, without any real universal standard to go by. Traditionally, they make this decision based on how much the offending person agrees with them or not. For me things seem to be a bit more fair on this board, but I don't know, maybe the non christians would not agree with that.