Hi there,
So this is what I have come to understand, in thinking about Creation and how it leads to survival: compounding adaptations creates more flourishing, than diversifying adaptations, in the end. This means that it is not up for competition, to eliminate lesser survivors, for being less flourishing. I have always found it hard to understand, why fitness should mean species merely survive, when they could flourish - but now I know the reason is, that Evolutionists paint a diminishing perspective of fitness, without clarifying that the flourishing of diversity is less than the flourishing of compounding. A species that has a strong correlation with other flourishers, does not need to eliminate the least fit.
The key point, is that compounding does not flourish most, until the end. That's not to say it won't flourish more, by the end, it just means that those that diversify go off half cocked - the better they could flourish is irrelevant to them, because they have enough to begin the hunt, for the least fit. If the least fit, can out flourish the diversifying in the end, they have all the reason to flourish as much as they possibly can. There is even a partial reason, for the diversifying to leave the situation the way it is, diversifying contributes to the flourishing of the compounding, by provoking the compounding to test their limits early.
Testing the limits of compounding flourishing, early, means that the strain is to develop strength ahead of time, before the question of fitness can be resolved one way or the other. In this sense, when the hunt is not on, the compounding can be thought to be gaining fitness, even before they actually are. If the compounding are thought to be fit already, there is no reason to change what is considered fit and compounded thus, making compounding both preeminent and secure in its greater flourishing. Diversifying around this readiness, the diversifying preserve the hunt, before the exact nature of the sacrifice is understood. So it is that compounding adaptations, initially has the approval of the diversifying.
Survival of the Fittest, thus becomes a return to the approval - for the hunted.
(that being the case, the compounding do not need metamorphosis, to deliver the kind - but adaptations that will increase the dynamism of their greater flourishing)
So this is what I have come to understand, in thinking about Creation and how it leads to survival: compounding adaptations creates more flourishing, than diversifying adaptations, in the end. This means that it is not up for competition, to eliminate lesser survivors, for being less flourishing. I have always found it hard to understand, why fitness should mean species merely survive, when they could flourish - but now I know the reason is, that Evolutionists paint a diminishing perspective of fitness, without clarifying that the flourishing of diversity is less than the flourishing of compounding. A species that has a strong correlation with other flourishers, does not need to eliminate the least fit.
The key point, is that compounding does not flourish most, until the end. That's not to say it won't flourish more, by the end, it just means that those that diversify go off half cocked - the better they could flourish is irrelevant to them, because they have enough to begin the hunt, for the least fit. If the least fit, can out flourish the diversifying in the end, they have all the reason to flourish as much as they possibly can. There is even a partial reason, for the diversifying to leave the situation the way it is, diversifying contributes to the flourishing of the compounding, by provoking the compounding to test their limits early.
Testing the limits of compounding flourishing, early, means that the strain is to develop strength ahead of time, before the question of fitness can be resolved one way or the other. In this sense, when the hunt is not on, the compounding can be thought to be gaining fitness, even before they actually are. If the compounding are thought to be fit already, there is no reason to change what is considered fit and compounded thus, making compounding both preeminent and secure in its greater flourishing. Diversifying around this readiness, the diversifying preserve the hunt, before the exact nature of the sacrifice is understood. So it is that compounding adaptations, initially has the approval of the diversifying.
Survival of the Fittest, thus becomes a return to the approval - for the hunted.
(that being the case, the compounding do not need metamorphosis, to deliver the kind - but adaptations that will increase the dynamism of their greater flourishing)
