Comey Memo

[Allandavid]

I don't know what my response will be until I read it. Why is that unreasonable? It shouldn't be.



Wow. A whole section! Bring out the hangman! WE A SECTION!

Section normally means there is more. Did you know that is a fact too? Which is what I said I would start to judge when that is revealed - you know the entirety not just a section. Unfortunately, that is unreasonable today. We can't wait until the entire MEMO - not just a section - is out. Okay then.

I would hope Comey would keep documents, and memos. It's his job to do that. lol did you know that is a FACT too? It's called documentation. All people in his position do that. Yep, it's a given. Why you seem to feel no one knows that fact also is beyond me.

Knowing he did his job, and you read one section of one memo out of tons no doubt he has written in his career doesn't do much. Could it be bigger once the ENTIRE thing is revealed? Could be. We don't know yet. Well, except for you. One section of one memo without knowing the entire circumstance, context, etc - things even Comey uses - is enough for you and others I guess. How sad. Maybe you need to grab his job! It will speed the process up no doubt!

I didn't say there was nothing. Read it again. I said we have learned nothing new since the story broke. Days ago. Tons of speculation - which is a whole lot of nothing - and is still nothing. That is fact too. I'm waiting to see more facts before I judge the circumstance.

You want to read a couple of sentences, and not understand the entire circumstance before judging? lol KNOCK yourself out! You can do that.

Good grief....over-reacting much...!?

Where have I suggested we should call for the hangman..?? Like you, I look forward to further investigation. Where we perhaps differ is that I am more suspicious of the "let's get this over quickly" or "there's no evidence" or "nothing to see here" crowd...

And again, we have been presented with SOME information....that isn't "nothing", as you earlier claimed...

 

[NightHawkeye]

So tell me, what will be your response when the full transcript of the memo is released? If it consolidates the claim thus far that Trump tried to influence Comey to drop the Flynn investigation, what will be your view?

What will yours be if he did?

Will it be the same as it was when Obama did influence Comey ... who then dropped the investigation into Hillary's misdeeds?

 

[NotreDame]

I am? I was just showing that there continues to be new information coming out day by day - in contrast to the claim that there's nothing new to the story.

But Hannah's point, which you were addressing, was not "there's nothing new to the story." You apparently addressed a Strawman.

 

[KCfromNC]

But Hannah's point, which you were addressing, was not "there's nothing new to the story."

We don't need to yack that to death with nothing new to go on.

 

[NotreDame]

That's compelling if you ignore her post in which she addresses what you are saying. However, she took into consideration what you are treating as "new," and what the media had already reported, which necessarily means, at the time she made her remark, there was "nothing new to go on." You had not presented anything " new to go on" and neither had the media at the time of her remark.

 

[NotreDame]

.

 

[NotreDame]

DP

 

[TLK Valentine]

LOL, Comey seems to have a pattern of sitting on important information for extended periods of time, doesn't he?

Lot of that going around -- Dig up Scalia and ask him.

 

[KCfromNC]

That's compelling if you ignore her post in which she addresses what you are saying. However, she took into consideration what you are treating as "new," and what the media had already reported, which necessarily means, at the time she made her remark, there was "nothing new to go on."

ITT I learned that a new report isn't new if you put "new" in quotes. I guess this is the kind of stuff we get when Trump's twitter goes silent and there's no guidance on which "new" (oops) talking points to use.

 

[NotreDame]

ITT I learned that a new report isn't new if you put "new" in quotes. I guess this is the kind of stuff we get when Trump's twitter goes silent and there's no guidance on which "new" (oops) talking points to use.

Regardless, Hannah made an excellent point regarding the available evidence as the evidence existed at the time of her remark.