Well, whatever "theology" might (or might not) have to do with this, you also said that "actually doing the things Christ commanded and taught are of a completely secondary, and even unimportant nature. As such, the reverence is not really there, since it does not follow with any real commitment."
And this is Protestant theology. The theological evolution of Martin Luther, which was later adopted in one fashion or another by Calvin or Zwingli. The works based theology of Catholicism, that requires repentance as a Sacrament, requires baptism, requires action. This is what Luther rejected, in part because of the corruption of the Catholic Church at the time, but Luther also threw the baby out with the bath water in rejecting the actions Christ commanded.
This is the sort of thing that violates the entire premise of this site existing, breaks at least a few rules - and generally sucks the life out of a room. Plus, it's false.
Have a nice day
Not at all. If you do not know the above, you have been failed by many people in your life, to include pastors, teachers, parents, etc... It is kind of interesting, however, that you would say it violates the site rules. The site rules begin with the Council of Nicaea, which happened well after Christ. There were decades of Christianity before Nicaea, and it was a vibrant and relatively dynamic faith.
What you think is Christianity certainly has numbers, but it is not the entirety of the story. It ignores the history and depth that Christianity has, that does not come through. Delving the depth of that story, delving the depth of your faith, could do several things...
1. You could leave Christianity. Information has that possibility.
2. You could grow as a Christian.
Christians are trying to shield the faith because of number 1, and this is a significant possibility. What is missed is that without 2, people leave anyway, because no one wants a faith without depth.